Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Yaduveer Singh JadonversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The court granted permission to withdraw the application and disposed of it without expressing any opinion on the merits.

Summary

The petitioners, Yaduveer Singh Jadon and Rahul Sharma, filed an application in the Patna High Court in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding. During the pendency of the case, charges were framed against them. The petitioners then sought the court's permission to withdraw the application, stating they wished to raise all points at the appropriate stage of the trial. The court, after hearing counsel for both sides, allowed the withdrawal of the application. Consequently, the application was disposed of as withdrawn, and the court expressly noted that it did not express any opinion on the merits of the case.

Issues considered

  • Whether the High Court may grant permission to withdraw an application after charges have been framed in a criminal proceeding

Subjects

  • withdrawal of application
  • criminal procedure
  • procedural order
  • high court discretion

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2594 of 2025
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-52 Year-2024 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Gopalganj
                 ======================================================
           1.     Yaduveer Singh Jadon S/O Lal Singh Jadon Resident of village- Kirti
                  Kapura, P.S.- Sambalgadh, District- Muraiva, M.P.
           2.    Rahul Sharma S/O Brajnandan Sharma Resident of Matrekhi, P.S.- Aata,
                 District- Jalaun, U.P.

                                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :         Mr.Manoj Kumar Singh, Adv
                 For the Opposite Party/s :         Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   24-03-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner

                   seeks permission to withdraw this application as during the

                   pendency of this case charges came to be framed and further

                   prays to raise all the points available to him and also the

                   grounds pleaded in this application at the appropriate stage of

                   the trial.

                                 3. Prayer is allowed.

                                 4. Accordingly, the application is disposed of as

                   withdrawn.

                                 5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2594 of 2025(2) dt.24-03-2026
                                                         2/2




                       any opinion on the merits of this case.



                                                  (Praveen Kumar, J)
niku/-

U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.