Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Vishal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted regular bail to the petitioner.

Summary

Vishal Kumar was arrested in connection with a dowry‑death case (Karpi PS Case No. 79/2025) alleged under Sections 80, 85 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleges he killed his wife for dowry, while the petitioner contends he was working in Rajasthan at the time of the incident and was falsely implicated. He has been in custody since 23‑05‑2025 and claims a clean antecedent. He applied for regular bail, undertaking to cooperate with the trial. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the bail, but the court, after considering the facts, allowed the bail application, directing the petitioner to furnish a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail should be granted to the accused in a dowry‑death case under the B.N.S. and Dowry Prohibition Act.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • dowry death
  • regular bail
  • Dowry Prohibition Act
  • B.N.S.
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26024 of 2026
                          Arising Out of PS. Case No.-79 Year-2025 Thana- KARPI District- Arwal
                 ======================================================
                 Vishal Kumar Son of Sidhnath Bhagat @ Bhaglu Bhagat Resident of Village-
                 Lodipur, P.S.- Karpi, District- Arwal, Bihar

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Ramakant Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Shyam Kumar Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   20-04-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Karpi

                   P.S. Case No. 79/2025 registered for the offences punishable

                   under Sections 80, 85 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 3/ 4 of

                   Dowry Prohibition Act.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, petitioner is accused of

                   killing his wife for demand of dowry.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the

                   present case. It is next submitted that the petitioner was working

                   in Rajasthan and was not present at the place of occurrence

                   when the deceased committed suicide. Learned counsel further

                   submits that the charge-sheet has been submitted under Section
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26024 of 2026(2) dt.20-04-2026
                                                          2/2




                        108 B.N.S. by the learned Magistrate. Learned counsel further

                        submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and he is in custody

                        since 23.05.2025. The petitioner undertakes to co-operate in the

                        case/ trial.

                                     5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer

                        for regular bail of the petitioner.

                                     6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the

                        case, this application for regular bail is allowed.

                                     7. Accordingly, let the petitioner, above named, be

                        released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten

                        Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                        satisfaction of the learned Additional Session Judge-I, Arwal

                        /concerned Court below in connection with Karpi P.S. Case No.

                        79/2025.



                                                   (Sandeep Kumar, J)
tusharika/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.