Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sheikh Chand @ Chand Mahmmad @ Shekh Chand MahmmadversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioners, subject to a bond and specified conditions.

Summary

The petitioners, Sheikh Chand and relatives, were arrested on 11 January 2026 in connection with a murder case (PS Case No. 590 of 2025) alleged to involve dowry demands. They sought bail, arguing they have no prior criminal record and that the FIR contains only a generic allegation against all accused, with no specific charge against them. The prosecution opposed bail, asserting the seriousness of the offence under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023. The court examined the lack of specific allegations and the petitioners' clean antecedent, and consequently ordered their release on bail with a bond of Rs.10,000 each and several conditions, including cooperation with the trial and non‑tampering with evidence. The bail order was conditioned on verification of criminal antecedents and allowed for cancellation if conditions are breached.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioners accused of murder under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023 despite the seriousness of the offence.
  • Whether the absence of specific allegations against the petitioners in the FIR warrants bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • murder
  • dowry death
  • criminal procedure
  • clean antecedent
  • conditions of bail
  • BNS 2023

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26267 of 2026
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-590 Year-2025 Thana- MUFFASIL District- West Champaran
                 ======================================================
           1.     Sheikh Chand @ Chand Mahmmad @ Shekh Chand Mahmmad S/o Late
                  Seikh Kabul Hasan Resident of Village - Lalu Nagar, Baldari, Ward no 36,
                  P.S. - Bettiah Muffasil, District - West Champaran, Bihar.
           2.    Sabrun Nesha @ Subrun Nesha W/o Sheikh Chand @ Chand
                 Mohammad@Shekh Chand Mahmmad Resident of Village - Lalu Nagar,
                 Baldari, Ward no 36, P.S. - Bettisah Muffasil, District - West Champaran,
                 Bihar.
           3.    Ashad Alam @ Mahmmad Arsad S/o Sheikh Chand @ Chand Mahmmad
                 @Sekh Chand Mahmmad Resident of Village - Lalu Nagar, Baldari, Ward
                 no 36, P.S. - Bettisah Muffasil, District - West Champaran, Bihar.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Mayank Mohan, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Ms. Madhuri Lata, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   20-04-2026                    Heard Mr. Mayank Mohan, learned counsel for the

                   petitioners and Ms. Madhuri Lata, learned Additional Public

                   Prosecutor for the State.

                               2. Petitioners seeks bail who are in custody since

                   11.01.2026 in connection with Bettiah Mufassil P.S. Case No.

                   590 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 13.12.2025 for the offences punishable

                   under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.

                               3. According to prosecution case, petitioners along

                   with other accused persons have committed murder of the

                   informant's daughter due to non-fulfillment of demand of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26267 of 2026(2) dt.20-04-2026
                                            2/3




          dowry.

                      4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

          petitioners have clean antecedent and they have falsely been

          implicated in the present case. From perusal of the F.I.R it

          appears that there is no specific allegation of assault or demand

          of dowry attributed against these petitioners rather there is

          general and omnibus allegation against all the accused persons

          including these petitioners. Petitioner no. 1 is father-in-law,

          petitioner no. 2 is mother-in-law and petitioner no. 3 is the

          brother-in-law of the deceased and they have no concern at all

          from the family affairs of the deceased. In fact, they are living

          separately from the deceased and the deceased has committed

          suicide herself. He further submits that the police after

          investigation submitted the charge sheet against the petitioners.

          The petitioners are in custody since 11.01.2026.

                      5.    Learned       Additional       Public   Prosecutor   has

          vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

          that the petitioners have clean antecedent and there is no

          specific allegation against them, let the petitioners, above

          named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

          10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26267 of 2026(2) dt.20-04-2026
                                                        3/3




                      amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Bettiah,

                      West Champaran in connection with Bettiah Mufassil P.S. Case

                      No. 590 of 2025, subject to the following conditions:-

                                   i. Petitioners shall co-operate in the trial and shall be

                      properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court

                      and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and

                      on their absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient

                      reason, their bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

                                   ii. If the petitioners tampers with the evidence or the

                      witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to

                      move for cancellation of bail.

                                   iii. And further condition that the court below shall

                      verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and in case at

                      any stage it is found that the petitioners have concealed their

                      criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for

                      cancellation of bail bond of the petitioners. However, the

                      acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order

                      shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of

                      verification.



                                             (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Vanisha/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.