Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ajit Kr. @ Ajit Kr. SinghversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner subject to a bond of Rs 10,000 and specified conditions.

Summary

Ajit Kr. Singh was arrested in connection with a violent incident in Raxaul where, after an informant demanded money, he and co‑accused assaulted the informant and stabbed the informant's son in the abdomen. He has been in custody since 25 November 2025 and faces charges under IPC sections 341, 323, 325, 307, 504 and 506. The petitioner pleaded that he has a clean antecedent, was falsely implicated, and acted without intent to kill, merely in a spur‑of‑the‑moment reaction. The prosecution opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the offences, especially attempt to murder. The court, after considering the petitioner’s clean record and lack of prior similar conduct, granted bail on a bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties and imposed conditions of court attendance, non‑tampering with evidence, and verification of antecedents.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to a person accused of offences including attempt to murder, grievous hurt and criminal intimidation.
  • Whether the petitioner’s clean antecedent and alleged lack of intent to kill justify bail despite the seriousness of the charges.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • Indian Penal Code
  • attempt to murder
  • grievous hurt
  • criminal intimidation
  • court conditions
  • sureties

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26296 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-557 Year-2022 Thana- RAXAUL District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Ajit Kr. @ Ajit Kr. Singh Son of Baban Singh Resident of Village- Gamhariya
                 PS- Raxaul District- East Champaran

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Jitendra Kumar Giri, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   20-04-2026                     Heard Mr. Jitendra Kumar Giri, learned counsel for

                   the petitioner as well as Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, learned

                   Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                               2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since

                   25.11.2025 in connection with Raxaul P.S. Case No. 557/2022,

                   F.I.R. dated 22.11.2022 for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 341, 323, 325, 307, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal

                   Code.

                               3. According to prosecution case, when the informant

                   went to the house of the co-accused, Baban Singh and

                   demanded money for ploughing field he was abused. Upon

                   objection, the petitioner along with other co-accused persons

                   came out of their house variously armed and started assaulting

                   the informant. When the informant’s on intervened, the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26296 of 2026(2) dt.20-04-2026
                                            2/3




          petitioner stabbed him with knife in his stomach due to which

          he sustained injuries.

                      4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

          petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been

          implicated in the present case. Although there is specific

          allegation against the petitioner of assaulting the informant’s

          son, namely, Rajeev Kumar @ Sanjay Singh by means of knife

          in his abdomen and he has received the injury. Learned counsel

          for the petitioner submits that there was no intention to kill

          anyone and due to spur moment this present occurrence took

          place. He further submits that the police after investigation

          submitted the charge sheet against the petitioner           and the

          petitioner is in custody since 25.11.2025.

                      5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor have

          vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances,

          petitioner has clean antecedent and there is no repetition of blow

          on the son of the informant, let the petitioner, above named, be

          released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten

          Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

          satisfaction of the learned CJM, Motihari, East Champaran in

          connection with Raxaul P.S. Case No. 557/2022, subject to the
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26296 of 2026(2) dt.20-04-2026
                                                         3/3




                       following conditions:-

                                    i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be

                       properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court

                       and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and

                       on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient

                       reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

                                    ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the

                       witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to

                       move for cancellation of bail.

                                    iii. And further condition that the court below shall

                       verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at

                       any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his

                       criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for

                       cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the

                       acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order

                       shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of

                       verification.



                                              (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
atul/-

U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.