Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ramashish Kumar @ Ashish Kumar @ Sutar Baba @ Shutar BabaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

Bail was denied to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Ramashish Kumar, was charged in Beur P.S. Case No.821 of 2023 for offences under IPC sections 414, 467, 468 and 471 and under the Arms Act sections 25(1‑B)a, 26 and 35. A 9 mm loaded pistol with cartridges was recovered from him and he has been in custody since 11‑12‑2023. He also faces ten other criminal cases, including three murder charges, indicating a serious criminal antecedent. This was his third application for bail. The Court, after hearing counsel, considered the nature of the allegations and his prior record and declined to grant bail. Consequently, the bail application was rejected.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner given the seriousness of the offences under the IPC and Arms Act and his multiple pending criminal cases?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • Indian Penal Code
  • Arms Act
  • serious offences
  • multiple criminal cases
  • antecedents

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26343 of 2026
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-821 Year-2023 Thana- BEUR District- Patna

                 ======================================================
                 Ramashish Kumar @ Ashish Kumar @ Sutar Baba @ Shutar Baba Son of
                 Jitendra Prasad Yadav Resident of Mohalla - West Jai Prakash Nagar, P.S.-
                 Jakanpur, Dist- Patna, Permanent Resident of Vill. - Maharana, P.S.-Dharhara,
                 Dist- Munger.

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                          ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner     :         Mr. Sitesh Kashyap, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party :         Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   06-05-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                  2.        This is the third attempt on behalf of the

                   petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Beur P.S. Case

                   No.821 of 2023 registered for the offence under sections 414,

                   467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code and under sections

                   25(1-B)a/26/35 of the Arms Act.

                                  3.        One 9 MM loaded pistol with cartridges have

                   been recovered from the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody

                   since 11.12.2023.

                                  4.        The petitioner is accused in ten more

                   criminal cases which includes three cases of murder.

                                  5.        Considering the nature of allegation levelled
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26343 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026
                                                          2/2




                        against the petitioner and also his antecedents, I am not inclined

                        to grant him bail. Accordingly, this bail application is rejected.



                                                                   (Sandeep Kumar, J)

pawan/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.