Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Surajdeo Singh @ Suraj @ Surya Dev SinghversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that, in view of the simple nature of injuries, lack of repeated assault and clean antecedent, anticipatory bail was appropriate under Section 482(2).

Summary

Surajdeo Singh was named in an FIR for allegedly assaulting an informant with an iron rod and subsequently stone‑pelting her husband, leading to injuries. The petitioner contended that the assault was not repeated, the injuries were simple, and the incident was a free fight in which he also sustained injuries, asserting a clean antecedent. He applied for anticipatory bail, which the State opposed. The court examined the medical report and the nature of the alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and found no prima facie intention to cause death. Consequently, the court granted anticipatory bail on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to Section 482(2) of the Act.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
  • Whether the alleged assault constitutes a serious offence warranting denial of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • assault
  • intent to cause death
  • clean antecedent
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
  • Section 482
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26532 of 2026
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-4 Year-2026 Thana- BARABAR TOURIST District- Jehanabad
                 ======================================================
                 Surajdeo Singh @ Suraj @ Surya Dev Singh S/O Indradeo Singh @ Indra
                 Dev Singh R/O Village- Bhagwanpur, P.S- Vishunganj, (Barabar Tourism),
                 Dist- Jehanabad.

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Umesh Kumar
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwary
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   30-04-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State .

                                2.    The     petitioner    named      in    the    F.I.R.    and

                   apprehending his arrest in connection with Barabar Tourism

                   (Vishnuganj) P.S. Case No.04 of 2026. registered for the offence

                   punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109(1), 352, 351(2),

                   3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

                                3. As per the F.I.R., petitioner alleged to have

                   assaulted the informant by using iron rod in back of her head

                   and when the husband came to rescue her, the accused petitioner

                   along with other co-accused persons starting on pelting stone

                   upon them due to which the husband of the informant also

                   received serious injuries.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26532 of 2026(2) dt.30-04-2026
                                            2/3




                       4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner

          that even as per the F.I.R. the assault which is alleged to be

          made specifically by this petitioner in the back of the head of

          the informant not appears repeated. It is also pointed out that

          upon medical examination, the nature of injuries found simple

          in nature, which negates the intention to cause death out of

          alleged assault.

                       5. It is further argued that occurrence was free fight

          wherein petitioner has also received injury for which a case was

          also lodged by the petitioner’s side which was registered

          as Barabar Tourism (Vishunganj) P.S. Case No.5 of 2026.

          It is further submitted that the petitioner claims clean

          antecedent.

                       6. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for

          anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

                       7. In view of the aforesaid factual submissions and by

          taking note of the fact as prima facie assault alleged to be made

          by petitioner not appears repeated, wherein injury as found after

          medical examination was also simple in nature, prima facie

          negates intention to cause death, accordingly, the petitioner, as

          named above, who is person of clean antecedent, in the event of

          his arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, be
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26532 of 2026(2) dt.30-04-2026
                                                        3/3




                      enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees

                      Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                      satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class,

                      Jehanabad, in connection with Barabar Tourism (Vishnuganj)

                      P.S. Case No.04 of 2026, subject to the conditions laid down

                      under section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,

                      2023.




                                                                  (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)

sanjeev/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.