Patna High Court
BUDHAN THAKURversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
Holding
The application is disposed of as not pressed due to the petitioner's non‑appearance.
Summary
Budhan Thakur filed a petition against the State of Bihar in the Patna High Court. The trial court had indicated it would conclude the trial within six months. A status report was filed on 25-02-2026, but the petitioner did not appear to press the pending application. The court noted that the trial appeared to have been concluded and there was no justification to keep the application alive. Consequently, the court disposed of the application as not pressed.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate course of action when the petitioner fails to appear to press a pending application?
Subjects
- criminal procedure
- application pending
- non‑appearance
- disposal of application
- high court order
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26553 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-774 Year-2016 Thana- MUZAFFARPUR TOWN District-
Muzaffarpur
======================================================
BUDHAN THAKUR Son of Chandeshwar Thakur Resident of Village -
Marpa Issar Das, P.S.- Mejarganj, District - Sitamarhi.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Syed Ehteshamuddin, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
ORAL ORDER
3 25-02-2026 Pursuant to the order dated 22.12.2023, a status report
has been received.
2. It appears from the communication as contained in
Letter No. 07 dated 17.01.2024 that the learned trial court was
making all endeavours to conclude the trial in this case as early
as possible within six months.
3. Today, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner to
press this application.
4. In the circumstances, this Court has reasons to
believe that perhaps the trial has been concluded. There is no
reason to keep the application pending.
5. Accordingly, it is disposed of as not pressed.
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)
Rishi/-
U
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.