Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner subject to the conditions of Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. and Section 482(2) BNSS.

Summary

Manish Kumar was named in an FIR for alleged assault, robbery and threats involving a pistol, under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes. He contended that the incident was an accident, the injuries were minor, and the case was false. The prosecution opposed bail. The court examined the nature of the injuries, the alleged intent, and the petitioner’s clean antecedents. Finding that the injuries were simple and did not prima facie indicate intent to cause death, the court ordered his release on bail with a bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Issues considered

  • Whether the nature of the injuries and alleged offences justify denial of bail.
  • Whether the petitioner’s antecedents and the circumstances warrant bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Section 438
  • Section 482
  • assault
  • robbery
  • intent to cause death
  • injury assessment
  • clean antecedent

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26755 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-180 Year-2025 Thana- LAKHISARAI District- Lakhisarai
                 ======================================================
                 Manish Kumar S/o Akwal Yadav @ Ramakbal Yadav Resident of Village -
                 Murwariya, P.S. - Pipariya, District - Lakhisarai.
                                                                           ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                    ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Adv
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Dr. Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   27-04-2026                  Heard the parties.

                                2. The petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and

                   apprehending his arrest in connection with Lakhisarai P.S. Case

                   No. 180 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 109(1), 352, 351(2) and 3(5)

                   of the BNS.

                                3. As per FIR, petitioner along with other three named

                   co-accused persons and six unknown persons all residents of

                   village Pipariya Distt. Lakhisarai assaulted informant and his son,

                   while they were returning after attending one yagya on his

                   motorcycle and also alleged to snatch Rs. 20,000/- under life

                   threat showing pistol.

                                4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on

                   behalf of the petitioner that motorcycle of the petitioner and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26755 of 2026(2) dt.27-04-2026
                                            2/3




          informant dashed while they were returning after attending local

          yagya. It is submitted that out of said accident as informant and

          his son received minor injuries, taking advantage of same present

          false case was lodged. It is further submitted that in terms of FIR

          three known including six unknown persons were involved in

          assaulting informant and his son, but presence of only one visible

          injury upon informant and his son making entire occurrence

          doubtful particularly the manner of assault. It is submitted that

          upon medical examination injury as received by the informant

          and his son found simple in nature prima-facie negating intention

          to cause death. While concluding arguments, it is submitted that

          above named petitioner is a man of clean antecedent.

                       5. Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail.

                        6. In view of aforesaid factual submission and by

          taking note of fact as nature of injury appears simple in nature

          prima-facie negating intention to cause death, accordingly

          petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender

          before the court below within a period of four weeks, is directed

          to be released on bail,          furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-

          (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each

          to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Lakhisarai/concerned

          Court, where the case is pending in connection with Lakhisarai
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26755 of 2026(2) dt.27-04-2026
                                                           3/3




                         P.S. Case No. 180 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid

                         down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C/ Section 482(2) of

                         BNSS.


                                                            (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)
S.Tripathi/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.