Patna High Court
Mahsar AlamversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- KHATIM REZA
Holding
The court granted regular bail to the petitioner.
Summary
The petitioner, Mahsar Alam, was charged under Sections 137(2), 96, 351(2) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for allegedly kidnapping the daughter of an informant. He contended that the accusation was false and that the victim, a 16‑year‑old girl, had voluntarily gone to Delhi, married him, and later withdrew her complaint, as recorded under Section 183 of the B.N.S.S. The petitioner highlighted that the lower court had erroneously noted a rape allegation, which was not present in the charge sheet, and that he had been in custody since 17‑10‑2025 with no prior criminal record. The State opposed the bail on the ground of the seriousness of the offences. After considering the victim’s voluntary statement, the lack of a rape charge, and the petitioner’s clean record, the High Court ordered his release on regular bail with a bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail despite charges of kidnapping and related offences
- Whether the alleged error regarding a rape charge affects the bail decision
- Whether the victim’s voluntary statement under Section 183 B.N.S.S. negates the prosecution’s case
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — s. 137(2), 183, 351(2), 352, 96
Subjects
- regular bail
- kidnapping
- false implication
- victim statement
- minor
- criminal procedure
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 2685 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-105 Year-2025 Thana- PAHARKATTA District- Kishanganj
======================================================
Mahsar Alam S/O Asgar Alam Resident of Village- Halda Gaon, Ward No.
14, P.S.- Paharkatta, Dist.- Kishanganj
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Ibrahim S/O late Maniruddin Resident of Village- Halda Gaon, Ward No. 14,
P.S.- Paharkatta, Dist.- Kishanganj
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Radha Mohan Singh, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Pradeep Narain Kumar, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA
ORAL ORDER
3 01-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in Paharkatta P.S.
Case No. 105 of 2025 dated 24-08-2025, registered under
Sections 137(2), 96, 351(2), 352 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
2023.
3. The allegation against the petitioner is that he
kidnapped the daughter of the informant.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the
present case. It is further submitted that the statement of the
victim has been recorded under Section 183 of the B.N.S.S.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 2685 of 2026(3) dt.01-04-2026
2/3
wherein, she has categorically stated that she had gone to Delhi
of her own free will, without informing her family members and
had solemnized marriage with the petitioner. She has further
stated that after coming to know about the false case lodged by
her parents, she returned and has in the last stated that she is not
willing to go to her parental house. It is also submitted that at
the time of recording her statement the learned Magistrate
assessed her age to be 16 years, 3 months and 27 days on the
basis of her matriculation certificate. Learned counsel for the
petitioner draws the attention of the Court towards the
impugned order dated 25.11.2025 passed in Bail Petition No.
359 of 2025, whereby the prayer for bail of the petitioner has
been rejected and submits that the learned District & Additional
Sessions Judge-I, Kishanganj has erroneously recorded that
there is an allegation of rape against the petitioner, which is a
clear error apparent on the face of the record. Lastly, it is
submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since
17.10.2025 and has no criminal antecedents.
5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State
has opposed the prayer.
6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of
the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 2685 of 2026(3) dt.01-04-2026
3/3
the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of
Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount
each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M. Kishanganj, in
connection with Paharkatta P.S. Case No. 105 of 2025.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Khatim Reza, J)
shyambihari/-
U
Checking your session…