Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Rita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL REJECTED

Holding

Anticipatory bail is denied.

Summary

Rita Devi sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged possession of 10 litres of illicit liquor. The prosecution alleged recovery of the liquor, but none was found in her possession. The petitioner claimed innocence and highlighted that a separate criminal case of a similar nature was already pending against her. The State opposed the bail, arguing the pending case and the seriousness of the offence. The Patna High Court declined to grant anticipatory bail, directing the petitioner to surrender within six weeks and instructing the trial court to consider her bail application on merits, noting her gender and lack of recovery from her possession.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under the circumstances of the alleged offence and a pending similar case.

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • prohibition and excise
  • illicit liquor
  • bail jurisprudence
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • gender considerations
  • pending criminal case

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26866 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-52 Year-2026 Thana- SANDESH District- Bhojpur
                 ======================================================
                 Rita Devi W/O Late Nagendra Chaudhary R/O Vill.- Sandesh Ward no. 12,
                 P.S.- Sandesh, Dist.- Bhojpur.
                                                                         ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                  ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Shiv Prasad Gupta, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Braj Kishore Pd.(APP)
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   22-04-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection

                   with Sandesh P.S. Case No. 52 of 2026, dated 23.02.2026,

                   lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise

                   (Amendment) Act, 2022, pending before the Court of Exclusive

                   Special Excise Court No. II, Bhojpur at Ara.

                                3. As per the prosecution, total recovery of 10 litres of

                   illicit liquor has been made, which is the subject matter of the

                   present case.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Counsel

                   further submits that nothing has been recovered from the

                   possession of the petitioner. Counsel also submits that the

                   criminal antecedent of the petitioner is not clean, as one
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26866 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026
                                                      2/2




                    criminal case is pending against her.

                                 5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for

                    bail of the petitioner and submits that one case of the same

                    nature is pending against the petitioner.

                                 6. In the present facts and circumstances, this Court is

                    not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

                    Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is

                    hereby rejected.

                                 7. It is directed to the petitioner to surrender before

                    the Trial Court within a period of 6 weeks from today. In case,

                    the petitioner surrenders within six weeks, then the Trial Court

                    is directed to pass order on her surrender-cum-bail application

                    on the same day without being prejudice that the anticipatory

                    bail of the petitioner has been rejected by this Court and the

                    Trial Court shall pass orders on the merits of this case,

                    considering that the petitioner is a female and recovery has not

                    been made from her possession.



                                                                         (Dr. Anshuman, J.)

Aman Kumar/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.