Patna High Court
Jitan ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- ANSHUMAN
Holding
The Court held that, given the petitioner’s clean antecedent and the absence of any recovery from his possession, anticipatory bail should be granted subject to a Rs 30,000 bond and verification of antecedents.
Summary
Jitan Manjhi sought anticipatory bail after the police lodged a case (PS Case No. 337 of 2025) under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 alleging possession of 30 litres of illicit liquor. The prosecution claimed recovery of the liquor, but none was found in the petitioner’s possession and he asserted a clean criminal record. The State opposed bail, while the petitioner’s counsel argued innocence and lack of material evidence. The High Court, applying the provisions of the BNSS, 2023 and Section 482(2) of the Code, granted anticipatory bail for four weeks, conditioned on a Rs 30,000 bond and verification of the petitioner’s antecedents. The order directed the Special Judge Excise Court‑I to accept the bond without delay but to cancel it if the petitioner concealed any prior convictions.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under the applicable provisions in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022.
- Whether the conditions imposed, including the bail bond and verification of criminal antecedent, are appropriate.
Legislation cited
- BNSS, 2023 — s. 2(1)(d), 482(2)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- illicit liquor
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
- Section 30(a)
- Section 482 CrPC
- bail bond
- criminal antecedent
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26892 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-337 Year-2025 Thana- Raghunathpur District- East Champaran
======================================================
Jitan Manjhi S/o Dukhan Manjhi Resident of Village - Saphi Britiya Mathiya
Tola, P.S. - Raghunathpur, Dist. - East Champaran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
ORAL ORDER
2 22-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection
with Raghunathpur P.S. Case No. 337 of 2025, dated
24.11.2025, lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition
and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022.
3. As per the prosecution, total recovery of 30 litres of
illicit liquor has been made, which is the subject matter of the
present case.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He further
submits that nothing has been recovered from the possession of
the petitioner. Furthermore, he submits that the petitioner has
clean criminal antecedent.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26892 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026
2/2
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for
bail of the petitioner.
6. As such, in the present facts and circumstances of
this case, let the above named petitioner be released on
anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the
Trial Court within a period of 4 weeks from today, on furnishing
bail bond of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand) as
mentioned in Section 2(1)(d) of the BNSS, 2023 to the
satisfaction of Special Judge Excise Court-I, East Champaran at
Motihari, in connection with Raghunathpur P.S. Case No. 337 of
2025, subject to the conditions as laid down U/s 482(2) of the
BNSS, 2023.
7. It is further directed that the Trial Court shall verify
the criminal antecedent of the petitioner, and in case it is found
at any stage that the petitioner has concealed his criminal
antecedent, the Trial Court shall take steps for cancellation of
the petitioner’s bail bond. However, the acceptance of the bail
bond in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed
for the purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Dr. Anshuman, J.)
Aman Kumar/-
U T
Checking your session…