Patna High Court
Chhotu KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- ANSHUMAN
Holding
The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to a bond and verification of his criminal antecedent.
Summary
The petitioner, Chhotu Kumar, feared arrest in an excise case (Case No. 1082 of 2025) involving 720 litres of illicit liquor, alleged under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. The prosecution linked the petitioner to the contraband through his ownership of a vehicle allegedly used by a co‑accused, Vikash Kumar. The petitioner contended he had no possession of the liquor, had a clean antecedent, and had merely lent the vehicle for unrelated purposes. The State opposed bail. The Court, applying Section 2(1)(d) of the BNSS, 2023 and the conditions of Section 482(2) of the same Act, granted anticipatory bail for four weeks, subject to a Rs 30,000 bond and verification of the petitioner’s criminal antecedent, with provision for cancellation if concealment is discovered.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under Section 2(1)(d) of the BNSS, 2023 in view of the alleged involvement in an excise offence.
- Whether the petitioner’s ownership of the vehicle used by a co‑accused suffices to justify denial of bail.
Legislation cited
- BNSS, 2023 — s. 2(1)(d), 482(2)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- excise offence
- illicit liquor
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
- BNSS 2023
- criminal antecedent
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27010 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1082 Year-2025 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Gaya
======================================================
Chhotu Kumar Son of Brij Kishore Mahto Resident of Village- Belahi
Nilkanth, P.S.- Runnisaidpur, Dist- Sitamarhi
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Saurav Anand, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Asha Devi, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
ORAL ORDER
2 22-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection
with Excise P.S. Case No. 1082 of 2025, dated 24.09.2025,
lodged under Sections 30(a) & 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition
and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022.
3. As per the prosecution, total recovery of 720 litres
of illicit liquor has been made, which is the subject matter of the
present case.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He further
submits that nothing has been recovered from the possession of
the petitioner. He also submits that the petitioner’s name has
figured in this case due to ownership of the alleged vehicle;
however, the petitioner submits that he had given his vehicle to
one co-accused, namely Vikash Kumar, for bringing some
stationery items. Furthermore, he submits that the criminal
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27010 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026
2/2
antecedent of the petitioner is clean.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for
bail of the petitioner.
6. As such, in the present facts and circumstances of
this case, let the above named petitioner be released on
anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the
Trial Court within a period of 4 weeks from today, on furnishing
bail bond of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand) as
mentioned in Section 2(1)(d) of the BNSS, 2023 to the
satisfaction of Exclusive Special Judge, Excise-III, Gaya, in
connection with Excise P.S. Case No. 1082 of 2025, subject to
the conditions as laid down U/s 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023.
7. It is further directed that the Trial Court shall verify
the criminal antecedent of the petitioner, and in case it is found
at any stage that the petitioner has concealed his criminal
antecedent, the Trial Court shall take steps for cancellation of
the petitioner’s bail bond. However, the acceptance of the bail
bond in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed
for the purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Dr. Anshuman, J.)
Aman Kumar/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.