Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Kamrul Hoda @ Md. Kamrul HodaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL REJECTED

Holding

The court held that bail could not be granted as the petitioner was implicated in a large‑scale drug seizure and had a prior similar conviction.

Summary

The petitioner, Kamrul Hoda, applied for bail in a case under Sections 8(c), 21(B)(ii)(c) and 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, where 287.55 quintals of ganja were recovered from a cowshed belonging to him. He claimed innocence, arguing that the cowshed was open and that no contraband was found in his personal possession, and that he had been in custody since 18‑09‑2025. The State opposed bail, highlighting the recovery of a large quantity of narcotics from the petitioner’s premises and his prior criminal antecedent of a similar nature. Considering the seriousness of the offence, the massive quantity seized, and the petitioner’s antecedent, the court rejected the bail application. The court also directed the trial court to expedite the trial and conclude it within one year of receiving the order.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner under the NDPS Act given the large quantity of narcotics recovered and his prior criminal antecedent
  • Whether the circumstances of the case warrant denial of bail despite the petitioner’s claim of innocence

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • NDPS Act
  • drug trafficking
  • large quantity seizure
  • criminal antecedent
  • trial expediting

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27041 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-325 Year-2024 Thana- RAMGARHWA District- East
                                                       Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Kamrul Hoda @ Md. Kamrul Hoda S/O Arkam Miyan Resident of Village-
                 Belahiya, P.S.-Ramgarhwa, District- East Champaran, Bihar.

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus

                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner      :       Mr. Ram Adya Singh, Advocate
                 For the State           :       Mr. Nand Kishore Prasad, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   08-05-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the

                   offence punishable under Sections 8(c), 21(B)(ii)(c) and 22 of

                   the N.D.P.S. Act.

                                3. As per prosecution case, 287.55 quintal Ganja was

                   recovered from the cowshed of this petitioner.

                                4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner

                   that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence.

                   Petitioner has falsely been implicated in this merely on

                   suspicion. No incriminating article has been recovered from

                   possession of this petitioner. The alleged cow shed is in an open

                   place and accessible to one and all. Moreover, charge-sheet has

                   already been submitted and petitioner is in custody since
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27041 of 2026(2) dt.08-05-2026
                                                         2/2




                       18.09.2025.

                                    5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has

                       vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner

                       and submitted that petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and 287.55

                       quintal Ganja was recovered from the cowshed of this

                       petitioner. Petitioner has got one criminal antecedent of similar

                       nature.

                                    6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the

                       case, nature of accusation, recovery of huge quantity of

                       contraband and criminal antecedent of the petitioner, the prayer

                       for grant bail of to the petitioner is rejected.

                                    7. However, considering the fact that petitioner is in

                       custody since 18.09.2025, the learned trial court is directed to

                       expedite the trial and conclude the same, preferably within a

                       period of one year from the date of receipt/production of a copy

                       of this order.



                                             (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
shashank/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.