Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sagar Kumar TantiversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioner subject to a bail bond of Rs. 10,000, two sureties, and the condition that bail will be withdrawn if a Section 82 proceeding is initiated.

Summary

The petitioner, Sagar Kumar Tanti, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 75 and 303(2) of the BNS for allegedly molesting an informant, attempting to undress her with intent to rape, and stealing her silver chain. The petitioner contended that the allegations were false and stemmed from a dispute over a mango tree near the informant's house. He argued that the investigation was complete, the charge‑sheet had been filed, and no proceeding under Section 82 of the Cr.P.C. had been initiated. The State opposed the bail application. The Court, noting that the investigation was concluded and that the conditions of Section 82 were not yet triggered, ordered the petitioner to be released on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to verification that no Section 82 proceeding is started, and compliance with Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner despite the seriousness of the offences alleged.
  • Whether the absence of a proceeding under Section 82 of the Criminal Procedure Code affects the bail decision.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • false implication
  • molestation
  • attempted rape
  • criminal procedure
  • Section 82
  • Section 482
  • Indian Penal Code
  • Bihar

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27091 of 2026
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-155 Year-2024 Thana- BATH District- Bhagalpur
                 ======================================================
                 Sagar Kumar Tanti S/O Late Vinod Tanti Resident of Village- Satanpur, P.O.-
                 Kumaitha, Police Station- Bath, Dist.- Bhagalpur.
                                                                            ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
                 The State of Bihar.                                 ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Dr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Binod Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   28-04-2026                    Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing

                   on behalf of the State.

                                  2. The accused/petitioner named in FIR and

                   apprehending his arrest in connection with Bath P.S. Case

                   No.     155 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable

                   under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 75 and 303(2) of the

                   BNS.

                                3. The allegation against the petitioner is to molest

                   the informant while she was cooking in her home and also to

                   untie the string of her salwar with intention to commit rape

                   upon her and when the ailing mother of the informant

                   started shouting, the petitioner fled away after taking silver

                   chain from the neck of the informant.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27091 of 2026(2) dt.28-04-2026
                                            2/3




                       4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on

          behalf of the petitioner that petitioner falsely implicated with

          present crime in question due to ownership disputes/counter

          claim qua one Mango tree grown near to the house of

          informant and petitioner. It is further submitted that

          allegation is to use criminal force to disrobe the informant,

          which is also not convincing that the petitioner alleged to run

          away from the place of occurrence without having any

          intervening circumstances. While concluding argument, it is

          submitted that investigation of this case is already

          completed, for which charge-sheet has been submitted, as

          such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence. It is

          also submitted that proceeding under Section 82 of Cr.P.C.

          has not been initiated against petitioner till now.

                       5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of bail.

                       6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by

          taking note of fact as investigation of this case is already

          concluded, accordingly, above named petitioner, in the event

          of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial Court,

          within a period of four weeks of the order, is directed to be
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27091 of 2026(2) dt.28-04-2026
                                                          3/3




                        released on bail furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-

                        (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

                        each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1 st

                        Class-cum-A.M.-IV, Bhagalpur/concerned Court, where the

                        case is pending in connection with Bath P.S. Case No. 155

                        of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under

                        Section 482(2) of the BNSS, with further condition:-

                                        Subject to verifying the submission of the

                                        learned counsel that the process under Section

                                        82 of Cr.P.C. was not initiated against petitioner

                                        till now and if it found that same has been

                                        initiated, the bail bond of the petitioner shall not

                                        be accepted.



                                              (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)
veena/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.