Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sultan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that the petitioner is entitled to regular bail and ordered his release on bond.

Summary

The petitioner, Sultan Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered under sections 137(2) and 140(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging that he abducted a 17‑year‑old girl for marriage. The petitioner contended that the allegations were false, that the relationship was consensual, and that the girl, now stating she is 18, had not supported the prosecution under section 183 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The State opposed bail, while the second opposite party did not oppose. Considering the lack of criminal antecedent, the girl's statement, and the duration of custody since 19‑02‑2026, the court granted regular bail on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties. The bail order was directed to be satisfied before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑I, Naugachia, Bhagalpur.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail despite allegations of kidnapping and child marriage under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
  • Whether the girl's statement under section 183 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, indicating she is 18 and does not support the prosecution, affects the bail decision.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • kidnapping
  • child marriage
  • minor
  • criminal procedure
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27161 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-248 Year-2025 Thana- Rangara District- Bhagalpur
                 ======================================================
                 Sultan Kumar, Son of Bageshwar Mandal, Resident of Village- Chapar
                 Diyara, P.S.- Rangra, District - Bhagalpur.
                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
           1.     The State of Bihar
           2.    X, Son of Late Baldev Mandal, Resident of village- Bhim Das tola, P.S.-
                 Rangra, District - Bhaglapur

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner       :        Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate
                 For the State            :        Ms. Asha Kumari, APP
                 For the O.P. No.2        :        Mr. Yash Raj Singh. Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   01-07-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the parties.

                                2. The petitioner has preferred this application for

                   grant of regular bail in connection with Rangara P.S. Case

                   no.248 of 2025, registered under sections 137(2) and 140(3) of

                   the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states

                   that the petitioner has taken away his 17 year old minor

                   daughter for the purpose of marriage.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. The allegation

                   of kidnapping etc. are all false and concocted. It is a case of love

                   affair between the parties. Both the petitioner and the daughter

                   of the informant have entered into marriage and propose to live
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27161 of 2026(4) dt.01-07-2026
                                                        2/2




                      together. The petitioner is in custody since 19.2.2026 and has no

                      criminal antecedent.

                                   5. The application for bail is opposed by learned

                      A.P.P. for the State however it is submitted that in her statement

                      under section 183 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,

                      2023, the daughter of the informant has stated her age to be 18

                      years and has not supported the prosecution case.

                                   6. Learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 has

                      appeared, however he does not oppose the application for bail.

                                   6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                      taking into consideration the allegation against the petitioner in

                      the F.I.R., the age of the daughter of the informant, the contents

                      of her statement under section 183 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 and the

                      petitioner having remained in custody since 19.2.2026, the

                      petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with

                      Rangara P.S. Case no.248 of 2025, on furnishing bail bond of

                      Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like

                      amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief

                      Judicial Magistrate-I, Naugachia, Bhagalpur.


                                                     (Partha Sarthy, J)
avinash/-
U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.