Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Jagat Keshari @ Jagat Narayan @ Jagat Kesri Mahto @ Jagat Narayan MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court held that the criminal case is prima facie instituted for a civil dispute and therefore granted bail to the petitioners.

Summary

The petitioners, Jagat Keshari and his son Anil Kumar, were arrested in connection with FIR No. 377/2024 for alleged document fraud, assault and other offences under various IPC sections. They contended that the dispute arose from a civil land disagreement, for which a title suit (No. 08/2014) is pending, and that the criminal case was filed to exert legal pressure. The State opposed bail, arguing the seriousness of the offences. The High Court observed that the criminal complaint appears to be a pretext for a civil dispute and noted the petitioners' clean antecedent. Consequently, the Court granted bail to both petitioners on a bond of Rs.10,000 each, with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Issues considered

  • Whether the criminal proceedings are maintainable when the underlying dispute is civil in nature
  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused petitioners

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • land dispute
  • criminal bail
  • civil suit
  • IPC offences
  • Section 482
  • BNSS
  • false criminal case

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27179 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-377 Year-2024 Thana- BIBHUTIPUR District- Samastipur
                 ======================================================
           1.     Jagat Keshari @ Jagat Narayan @ Jagat Kesri Mahto @ Jagat Narayan
                  Mahto S/o Vishnu Dev Mahto R/o Village - Madhopur, Khoksa, Ward No. 8,
                  P.S -Bibhutipur, District - Samastipur.
           2.     Anil Kumar S/o Jagat Keshari @ Jagat Narayan @ Jagat Kesri Mahto @
                  Jagat Narayan Mahto R/o Village - Madhopur, Khoksa, Ward No. 8, P.S
                  -Bibhutipur, District - Samastipur.
                                                                        ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar.                             ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Vijay Anand, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Ajay Kumar No. 2, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   29-04-2026                    Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioners       and      learned     Additional       Public     Prosecutor

                   appearing on behalf of the State.

                                2. The accused/petitioners named in FIR and

                   apprehending their arrest in connection with Bibhutipur P.S.

                   Case No. 377 of 2024, which was registered on the basis of

                   complaint case bearing no. 249/2024 dated 12.11.2024, for

                   the offences punishable under Sections 196, 197, 467, 418,

                   406, 420, 323, 324, 120(B) of the IPC.

                                3. As per FIR/complaint, the petitioners alleged to

                   create document fraudulently by using forged means and

                   also to assault and abuse the informant when the action of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27179 of 2026(2) dt.29-04-2026
                                            2/3




          petitioners was protested by the informant while they came

          to construct the house on the land which was claimed to be

          in possession of the informant.

                       4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on

          behalf of the petitioners that the occurrence was purely civil

          in nature, for which the present criminal case is completely

          unoccasioned and unwarranted. It is submitted that for the

          land dispute, a civil case is also pending before the learned

          trial court as Title Suit No. 08/2014. The parties are agnates

          and just to create a legal pressure, the present false criminal

          case was lodged. Petitioners claimed clean antecedent.

                       5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of bail.

                       6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by

          taking note of fact as the present criminal case is prima

          facie lodged for a dispute, which is purely civil in nature and

          for the same, a title suit is also pending before the learned

          trial court, as discussed aforesaid, accordingly, both above

          named petitioners, who are of clean antecedent, in the event

          of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial Court,

          within a period of four weeks of the order, is directed to be
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27179 of 2026(2) dt.29-04-2026
                                                          3/3




                        released on bail furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-

                        (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like

                        amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M.,

                        Rosera, District- Samastipur/concerned Court, where the

                        case is pending in connection with Bibhutipur P.S. Case No.

                        377 of 2024 subject to the conditions as laid down under

                        Section 482(2) of the BNSS.



                                              (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)
veena/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.