Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Hareram Paswan @ Budha SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The Court held that bail could not be granted in view of the serious nature of the offences alleged against the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Hareram Paswan, was arrested on 2 September 2025 in connection with a case registered under Section 111 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances (BNS) Act and several provisions of the Arms Act, alleging that he was operating an illegal arms factory. He applied for bail, asserting his innocence and claiming that he had been falsely implicated. The State opposed the bail application, emphasizing the seriousness of the offences and the alleged involvement in manufacturing arms. The Court examined the nature of the allegations and the risk to public safety inherent in the charges. Considering the gravity of the accusations, the Court was not inclined to grant bail and dismissed the petitioner's application. Consequently, the petitioner remains in custody pending trial.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner charged under Section 111 of the BNS Act and Sections 25(1‑A), 25(1‑AA), 25(1‑B), 26(1), 26(2) and 35 of the Arms Act

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • Arms Act
  • Bihar Narcotic Substances Act
  • criminal procedure
  • pre‑trial detention
  • serious offences

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27300 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-178 Year-2024 Thana- Singhaul District- Begusarai
                 ======================================================
                 Hareram Paswan @ Budha Sharma S/o Shankar Paswan Resident of village -
                 Naula, P.S - Bhagwanpur, District - Begusarai Presently residing at Mirganj
                 Ward No. 16 P.S - Begusarai Town, District - Begusarai

                                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                 The State of Bihar Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :         Mr.Sarvottam Kumar
                 For the Opposite Party/s :         Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   01-07-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Singhaul (Singhoul) P.S. Case No. 178 of 2024 registered for

                   the offence under Sections 111 of the BNS and under Sections

                   25(1-A), 25(1-AA), 25(1-B), 26(1), 26(2) and 35 of the Arms

                   Act.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is said to

                   have been found running an Arms factory.

                                4. The petitioner is in custody since 2.9.2025.

                                5. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the

                   petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and he has been

                   implicated in this case.
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27300 of 2026(3) dt.01-07-2026
                                                      2/2




                                 6.    Learned APP for the State has opposed the

                    application of the petitioner.

                                 7.    Considering the nature of allegation levelled

                    against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to

                    the petitioner.

                                 8. Accordingly, this application is dismissed.



                                                            (Sandeep Kumar, J)
Vikas/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.