Patna High Court
Sonu NutversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- SANDEEP KUMAR
Holding
Bail is granted to the petitioner with specified conditions.
Summary
The petitioner, Sonu Nut, was arrested in connection with the recovery of 20 litres of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act (Amendment). He had been in custody since 27 February 2026 and applied for bail, offering to donate Rs.25,000 to a charitable organization without admitting guilt. The State opposed the bail. The Court, after considering the submissions, granted bail on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, conditioned on the donation of Rs.25,000 to the Ramakrishna Mission Ashram, regular attendance at the police station every Sunday, and automatic cancellation if the petitioner is later involved in any Excise or NDPS case. The order is limited to the bail application and does not prejudice the merits of the trial.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act (Amendment).
- What conditions, if any, may be imposed on bail in such offences.
Subjects
- bail
- prohibition act
- illicit liquor
- criminal procedure
- conditions of bail
- charitable donation
- surety
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27464 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-371 Year-2024 Thana- MADHAURAH District- Saran
======================================================
Sonu Nut Son of Daharu Nut Resident of village - Vajit Bhoraha, P.S.-
Marhowrah, District - Saran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Gajendra Kumar Singh
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Pronoti Singh
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 28-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with
Marhowrah P.S. Case No. 371 of 2024 registered for the offence
under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise
Act(Amendment).
3. The recovery is of 20 liters of illicit liquor.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is innocent and he is in custody since 27.02.2026.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is ready to donate Rs. 25,000/- in some charitable
organization without accepting his guilt.
6. Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the
prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27464 of 2026(2) dt.28-04-2026
2/3
7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the
case and submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner, let
the petitioner, above named, be released on bail upon furnishing
bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the
like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned concerned
Court below in connection with Marhowrah P.S. Case No. 371
of 2024.
8. This is also subject to the condition that the
petitioner shall deposit an amount of Rs. 25,000/- in
Ramakrishna Mission Ashram, Latu Maharaj Path, Chapra a nd
produce the receipt of the same before the Court below. The bail
bonds of the petitioner shall be accepted after verifying the
genuineness of the receipt produced by the petitioner.
9. As a condition of this order, the petitioner after
being released on bail is directed to mark his attendance at
Marhowrah Police Station on every Sunday of each month. Any
default in appearance at the police station will result in
cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner.
10. It is made clear that if the petitioner, in future,
is found to be involved in any other case registered under the
provisions of Excise/NDPS Act then his bail bonds shall
automatically be cancelled.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27464 of 2026(2) dt.28-04-2026
3/3
11. It is, however, clarified that the observations
made herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail
application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at
any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not
expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Vikas/-
U
Checking your session…