Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Satyadev GondversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to a bail bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties.

Summary

The petitioner, Satyadev Gond, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The prosecution alleged that a co‑accused, caught with 180 litres of illicit liquor, identified the petitioner as one of two who escaped. The petitioner argued that no incriminating material was found on him and that he was falsely implicated, offering to cooperate with the investigation. The State opposed the bail. The Court, after considering the FIR, the co‑accused’s statement and the absence of any seized article from the petitioner, ordered that he be released on anticipatory bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, to be surrendered within four weeks.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail can be granted when the only evidence against the petitioner is a co‑accused’s statement and no material is recovered from his possession
  • Whether the petitioner is falsely implicated and thus entitled to bail under the provisions of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • section 30(a)
  • co‑accused statement
  • false implication
  • bail bond

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27522 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-549 Year-2025 Thana- BHORE District- Gopalganj
                 ======================================================
                 Satyadev Gond Son of Late Gobar Gond @ Gobardhan Gond R/O Vill.-
                 Jagdish Bantriya, P.S.- Bhore, District- Gopalganj

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Deepankar Raj, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   29-04-2026                    1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

                                   2. The petitioner in this application prays for grant

                   of anticipatory bail apprehending his arrest in connection with

                   Bhore P.S. Case no. 549 of 2025 registered for the offence

                   punishable under section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and

                   Excise Act, 2016.

                                   3. As per the prosecution case, on seeing the police

                   party three accused persons made an attempt to escape but one

                   was caught. The person who was caught disclosed the name of

                   the two persons who had managed to escape which included the

                   petitioner herein. On search, 180 litres of country liquor was

                   recovered from the person who was caught.

                                   4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   no incriminating article has been recovered from the petitioner's
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27522 of 2026(2) dt.29-04-2026
                                                      2/2




                    possession who has been falsely implicated in the case because

                    of his antecedent. The only material against him is the statement

                    of coaccused made for police. He undertakes to cooperate in the

                    investigation/trial.

                                    5. The application for bail is opposed by learned

                    APP for the State.

                                    6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                    taking into consideration the allegation in the F.I.R., the name of

                    the petitioner transpiring in the confessional statement of

                    coaccused made for police and no incriminating article having

                    been recovered from the petitioner's possession, it is directed

                    that the petitioner above named in the event of his arrest or

                    surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four

                    weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with

                    Bhore P.S. Case no. 549 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of

                    Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like

                    amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional

                    Sessions       Judge-XIII-cum-Special                Excise   Court   no.-I,

                    Gopalganj.


                                                (Partha Sarthy, J)
Bibhash

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.