Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Kanchan DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioner.

Summary

Kanchan Devi, the wife of alleged drug trafficker Rajesh Narayan Upadhyay, was arrested after 2.56 kg of heroin was recovered from her husband’s house. She applied for bail under the NDPS Act, asserting that no contraband was found on her, the seizure list was signed only by her husband and not by her, and that she has no prior criminal record. The State contended that the recovery from the house implicated her. The Court examined the absence of direct possession, the procedural lapse in the seizure documentation, and her prolonged custody since September 2025. Considering these factors, the Court ordered that she be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties. The order directs compliance with the Special Judge of the NDPS Act, Buxar.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted in an NDPS case where the accused is only the spouse of the alleged drug trafficker and no contraband is found in her possession.
  • Whether the failure to comply with Section 105 of the BNSS and the lack of the petitioner’s signature on the seizure list constitute a ground to grant bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • NDPS Act
  • drug trafficking
  • spouse liability
  • seizure list
  • procedural defect
  • criminal antecedent

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27603 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-192 Year-2025 Thana- DUMRAO District- Buxar
                 ======================================================
                 Kanchan Devi wife of Rajesh Narayan Upadhyay Resident of Village -Ekauni
                 PS- Dumraon District- Buxar


                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar


                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. N.K. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate
                                                  Mr. Satyapal Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Anand Kishore Choudhary, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER


2   19-06-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with

                   Dumraon P.S. Case No.192 of 2025 registered for the offence

                   punishable under Sections 21(c), 22(b), 25, 27(a) of N.D.P.S. Act.

                                 3. The case of the prosecution is that from the house of

                   the petitioner’s husband altogether 2.56 kg of heroin was

                   recovered. In the FIR, it has come that the husband of the

                   petitioner deals in the contraband.

                                 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

                   has submitted that the petitioner has been framed in this case only

                   on the basis that she is the wife of the petitioner Narayan
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27603 of 2026(2) dt.19-06-2026
                                                        2/2




                      Upadhyay from whose house, the contraband was recovered.

                      Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that nothing has

                      been recovered from the possession of this petitioner. The seizure

                      list witnesses are police personnel and police have not complied

                      section 105 of BNSS. It has further been submitted that the seizure

                      list does not bear the signature of this petitioner rather it bears the

                      signature of petitioner’s husband. A statement has been made in

                      para-3 that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent.

                      Moreover, she is in custody since 08.09.2025.

                                   5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

                      for the State.

                                   6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                      considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

                      inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

                      petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond

                      of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the

                      like amount each to the satisfaction of the court of learned Special

                      Judge, N.D.P.S. Act Buxar in connection with Dumraon P.S. Case

                      No.192 of 2025.



                                            (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Sneha/-
U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.