Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Piyush KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court granted regular bail to the petitioner.

Summary

Piyush Kumar applied for regular bail in a case under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, alleging that the seized 198.54 grams of brown sugar was recovered from a co-accused, Shivam Kumar, and not from his possession. He contended that the police seizure list did not comply with Section 105 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances (Control) Act and that he had been in judicial custody since 7 December 2025. The State opposed the bail. After hearing both sides, the Patna High Court found no material reason to deny bail and ordered the petitioner to be released on a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to the satisfaction of the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Bhagalpur.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail under the NDPS Act despite the seizure being made from a co-accused.
  • Whether non‑compliance with Section 105 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances (Control) Act by the police warrants denial of bail.
  • Whether the petitioner’s continued judicial custody since 07‑12‑2025 is justified.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • NDPS Act
  • regular bail
  • seizure procedure
  • Section 105
  • judicial custody

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27738 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-280 Year-2025 Thana- BIHPUR District- Bhagalpur
                 ======================================================
                 Piyush Kumar Son of Late Amit Choudhari Resident of village- Sonbarsha
                 Ward No 3, P S- Bihpur, District -Bhagalpur

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Subhash Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Ms.Gulnar Begum, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   19-06-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case

                   registered for the offence punishable under Sections 8(c), 21(b),

                   25 and 29 of the N.D.P.S. Act.

                                3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that in a

                   Scorpio vehicle, four persons were sitting was found and from

                   possession of one of them, namely, Shivam Kumar altogether,

                   198.54 grams of brown sugar was recovered.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has

                   committed no offence. Learned counsel for the petitioner has

                   submitted that nothing has been recovered from his possession.

                   Recovery, if any, has been made from the possession of co-
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27738 of 2026(2) dt.19-06-2026
                                                         2/2




                       accused Shivam Kumar. It has further been submitted that

                       witnesses of seizure list are police personnel. Police has not

                       complied Section 105 of the B.N.S.S. Moreover, petitioner is

                       languishing in judicial custody since 07.12.2025.

                                    5. Learned APP appearing for the State has

                       vehemently opposed the application for bail.

                                    6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                       considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

                       inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

                       petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

                       bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties

                       of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

                       Principal District and Sessions Judge, Bhagalpur in connection

                       with Bihpur P.S. Case No. 280 of 2025.



                                             (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
lata/-
U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.