Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Manpreet KaurversusThe Union of India Through Customs Dept, Airport customs, Gaya

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court granted regular bail to the petitioner, ordering provisional release pending verification of her criminal antecedent.

Summary

Manpreet Kaur was arrested at Gaya airport customs after 8.145 kg of ganja was seized from her luggage, leading to charges under sections 20(b)(ii)(b), 22(b), 25 and 29 of the NDPS Act. The petitioner pleaded innocence, argued procedural lapses in the seizure list (non‑compliance with Section 105 of the BNSS), and highlighted her lack of criminal antecedent. The Union of India contended that the marijuana was seized in her presence, confirmed by the forensic lab, and that the quantity exceeded the small‑quantity threshold, amounting to a commercial offence. After hearing both sides, the High Court considered the facts, the quantity involved, and the petitioner’s personal circumstances, and decided to grant regular bail on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to verification of any criminal antecedent. The trial court was directed to release the petitioner provisionally and confirm bail after the antecedent check.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail despite possession of 8.145 kg of ganja exceeding the small‑quantity threshold under the NDPS Act
  • Whether procedural defects in the seizure list (non‑compliance with Section 105 of the BNSS) affect the bail application
  • Whether the quantity seized constitutes a commercial quantity under the NDPS Act

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • NDPS Act
  • possession of narcotic
  • commercial quantity
  • customs seizure
  • criminal antecedent

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27846 of 2026
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-11 Year-2026 Thana- CUSTOM (GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL)
                                                      District- Gaya
                 ======================================================
                 Manpreet Kaur Daughter of Late Baljeet Singh Resident of village- Veer
                 singh Patti, VPO Dayalpura Mirza, Bhatinda Ps- Bhatinda, Dist- Bhatinda,
                 Punjab
                                                                            ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                  Versus
                 The Union of India Through Customs Dept, Airport customs, Gaya Bihar
                                                                     ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :     Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate
                                                Mr. Aryan Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :     Mr. Sriram Krishna, Sr./St. Counsel, Custom
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   22-06-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   counsel for the Union of India through Customs.

                                 2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case

                   registered for the offence punishable under sections 20(b)(ii)(b),

                   22(b), 25 and 29 of the NDPS Act.

                                 3. The case of the prosecution is that from the bag of the

                   petitioner, altogether 8.145 kg of ganja was recovered.

                                 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Learned

                   counsel for the petitioner has submitted that nothing has been

                   recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The witnesses of

                   the seizure list are police personnel and police have not complied

                   Section 105 of BNSS while preparing the seizure list. A statement

                   has been made in para-3 of this petition that the petitioner has got
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27846 of 2026(4) dt.22-06-2026
                                            2/3




          no criminal antecedent. Petitioner is a lady. Moreover, she is

          languishing in judicial custody since 27.01.2026.

                       5. Countering this, learned counsel for the Union of

          India through Customs has submitted that the petitioner was found

          carrying contraband substance concealed in two trolley bags

          brought by her from Bangkok via international flight which was

          seized in her presence and two independent witnesses are there.

          The contraband substance was confirmed to be Marijuana

          containing Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) as their chief intoxicating

          ingredient and by the FSL, Patna confirmed Ganja containing

          Dronabinol (Delta-9 Tetrahydrocannabinol). Learned counsel has

          further submitted that small quantity for Dronabinol is 2 grams

          and commercial quantity is 50 grams, as such, it has been

          submitted that the contraband which has been recovered from the

          possession of this petitioner is much more than commercial

          quantity.

                       6. Countering this, learned counsel for the petitioner has

          submitted that tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is the intoxicant

          material which is found in the marijuana but the total marijuana

          does not contain entire THC. Some part of it is ‘THC’ and that

          considering this, the Legislator has fixed the commercial quantity

          of ganja to be 20 kg. Learned counsel has further submitted that in

          any view of the matter, the contraband which has been recovered
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27846 of 2026(4) dt.22-06-2026
                                                        3/3




                      from the possession of this petitioner is though more than small

                      quantity but is much less than commercial quantity as per NDPS

                      Act.

                                   7. Learned counsel for the Union of India has

                      vehemently opposed and has submitted that the petitioner might

                      have criminal antecedent.

                                   8. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                      considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is

                      inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

                      petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with

                      Airport Customs Gaya P.S. Case No. 11 of 2026 on furnishing bail

                      bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like

                      amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge-cum-

                      Special Judge, NDPS Act, Gayaji.

                                   9. Learned trial court is directed that before

                      verifying the criminal antecedent of the petitioner, the court

                      may release the petitioner provisionally and her bail shall be

                      confirmed after the verification of her criminal antecedent.



                                            (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Shubham/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.