Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Aftab AlamversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The petition was dismissed as withdrawn because the petitioner had already been convicted.

Summary

The petitioner, Aftab Alam, is in custody for offences under Sections 414, 420, 467, 471, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 20, 22, 25, 29 of the NDPS Act arising from a case lodged on 13-12-2020. He approached the Patna High Court seeking to withdraw his petition, stating that he has already been convicted. The learned counsel for the State opposed the withdrawal. The Court examined whether a petition can be withdrawn after a conviction has been recorded. It held that the petition could be treated as withdrawn in view of the conviction. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a petition filed by a convicted person can be withdrawn after conviction

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • withdrawal of petition
  • conviction
  • criminal procedure
  • IPC
  • NDPS Act

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27899 of 2025
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-480 Year-2020 Thana- KUCHAIKOTE District- Gopalganj
                 ======================================================
                 Aftab Alam Son of Shaikh Murtuza Resident of Village - Bela, P.S.-
                 Ramgadhawa, District - East Champaran.

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Dharmveer, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Bharat Bhushan, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

9   10-04-2026                  Heard Mr. Dharmveer, learned counsel for the

                   petitioner and Mr. Bharat Bhushan, learned APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner is in custody in connection with .

                   Kuchaikot P.S Case No. 480 2020                 instituted under Sections

                   414, 420, 467, 471, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections

                   20,22,25, 29 of the NDPS Act lodged on 13.12.2020 by the

                   informant, Ashwani Kumar Tiwari.

                                3. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for

                   withdrawal of the petition.

                   4. It has been informed by the learned counsel for the petitioner

                   that the petitioner stands convicted and as such he may be

                   permitted to withdraw the same.
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27899 of 2025(9) dt.10-04-2026
                                                         2/2




                                       5. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as

                       withdrawn.



                                                      (Rajiv Roy, J)
Ravi/-

U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.