Patna High Court

Pahadi Bind @ Chandradeo BindversusThe State of Bihar

Decided: 29 April 2026
Disposal: BAIL GRANTED
Bench: PRAVEEN KUMAR

Holding

The Court allowed the petitioners' application for anticipatory bail.

Summary

Petitioners Pahadi Bind and Ajay Bind sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in Laxmipur Police Station Case No. 275 of 2025, which alleged their participation in an unlawful assembly that assaulted an informant and her son. The prosecution alleged offences under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, while the petitioners contended they were falsely implicated and had no allegation of assault against them, noting they were already on bail in other cases. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the bail. The Court examined the record and, applying Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, ordered that the petitioners be granted anticipatory bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions. The application for anticipatory bail was allowed.

Issues considered

Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners under Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita in the present case.
Whether the allegations against the petitioners constitute sufficient ground for their arrest.

Legislation cited

Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita — s. 109(1), 115(2), 117(2), 118(1)(2), 126(2), 127(2), 190, 191(2), 191(3), 303(2), 351(2), 482(2), 74

Subjects

anticipatory bail
unlawful assembly
assault
Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita
Section 482
bail bond
Jamui
Laxmipur

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27907 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-275 Year-2025 Thana- LAXMIPUR District- Jamui
                 ======================================================
           1.     Pahadi Bind @ Chandradeo Bind Son of Late Baleshwar Bind Resident Of
                  Village- Matiya Mohanpur Ps- Laxmipur District- Jamui
           2.     Ajay Bind Son of Pahadi Bind @ Chandradeo Bind Resident Of Village-
                  Matiya Mohanpur Ps- Laxmipur District- Jamui
                                                                       ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Satya Prakash Parasar
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Navin Kumar Pandey
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   29-04-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                               2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a

                   case in connection with Laxmipur P.S. Case No. 275 of 2025

                   dated 28.10.2025 registered for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 74, 351(2), 191(2), 191(3), 127(2), 126(2), 117(2),

                   118(1)(2), 115(2), 109(1), 190 and 303(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya

                   Sanhita.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners were

                   part of an unlawful assembly in which the co-accused persons

                   Indradeo Bind, Manish Bind and Mtriyunjay Bind assaulted the

                   informant and her son.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted

                   that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27907 of 2026(2) dt.29-04-2026
                                                       2/2




                     this case. It has further been submitted that there is case and

                     counter case between the parties and there is no allegation of

                     assault against these petitioners. The petitioner No.1 has been

                     made accused earlier in three other cases in which he is on bail

                     in all the cases while petitioner No.2 has been made accused in

                     two other cases in which he is on bail in both the cases.

                                  5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

                     opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

                                  6. Heard the parties and perused the record, let the

                     above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender

                     within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on

                     anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/-

                     (Rupees Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like

                     amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned,

                     Jamui in connection with Laxmipur P.S. Case No. 275 of 2025,

                     subject to conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of the

                     B.N.S.S.

                                  7. The application stands allowed.



                                                (Praveen Kumar, J)
shivam/-

U      T

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…