Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Pintu GondversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioners subject to a cash bond, sureties and strict conditions.

Summary

Petitioners Pintu Gond and Patarka Gond were arrested in connection with a gang‑rape case (Siwan Mahila P.S. Case No. 35 of 2023) under IPC sections 376, 323, 120 and POCSO sections 4 and 6. They have been in custody since 21 September 2023 and sought bail, assuring the court of diligent appearance in the trial. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the offences and a statement by the complainant. The trial‑court report indicated that only two of six witnesses had been examined, and the petitioners had already endured a long custodial period. Considering the limited progress of the trial and the petitioners' undertaking, the High Court inclined to grant bail subject to stringent conditions, including a cash bond, sureties, regular attendance before the trial court and police station, and a prohibition on tampering with evidence. The order released the petitioners on bail with the stipulated conditions.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused in a serious gang‑rape and POCSO case despite the gravity of the offences
  • Whether the custodial period and limited progress of the trial justify bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • gang rape
  • POCSO
  • custodial detention
  • trial delay
  • surety
  • conditions of bail

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27925 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-35 Year-2023 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Siwan
                 ======================================================
           1.     Pintu Gond Son of Late Rajendra Gond @ Rajendra Sah Resident of Village
                  - Bhopatpura, P.S.- Mairwa, District - Siwan, Bihar.
           2.    Patarka Gond @ Deepak Gond@ Deepak Kumar Son of Late Rajendra
                 Gond @ Rajendra Sah Resident of Village-Bhopatpura, P.S.- Mairwa,
                 District - Siwan, Bihar.

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    Most. Lailun Khatoon wife of Late Mukhtar Ansari Resident of village-
                 Bhopatpura, Ps - Mairwa, Dist- Siwan

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Vijay Shanker Tiwari, Advocate
                 For the State            :        Mr. Rabindra Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   03-07-2026                          Heard the parties.

                                 2. The petitioner is in custody in connection with

                   Siwan Mahila P.S. Case No. 35 of 2023 for the offence

                   punishable under sections 376, 323 and 120 of the Indian Penal

                   Code       and section 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act, lodged on

                   31.07.2023 by the informant, Md. Lailun Khan.

                                 3.     As      per      the      prosecution          story,        the

                   complainant/informant alleged that the accused persons took her

                   daughter and committed gang rape, as a result whereof, she

                   became pregnant, though the lady tried in vain to lodge FIR, as

                   the police delayed, the case was filed.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27925 of 2026(3) dt.03-07-2026
                                            2/3




                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that they

          have already suffered by being in custody since 21.09.2023 and

          though the trial has commenced, it will take some time. Both of

          them shall be diligently appearing in trial, if granted relief, and

          in no way shall delay the trial failing which the State can take

          steps for cancellation of bail bond.

                       5. Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail the girl

          has made statement in the court.

                       6. Though the allegation is against the two petitioners

          is grave, the Trial Court report dated 27.06.2026 shows that out

          of six witnesses, only two witnesses have been examined, the

          petitioners are in custody since 21.09.2023 and an undertaking

          has been given that they shall be diligently appearing in trial, in

          that background, this Court is inclined to extend him the

          privilege of bail.

                       7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing

          bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of

          like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional

          Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Court for POCSO, Siwan, Bihar,

          in connection with Siwan Mahila P.S. Case No. 35 of 2023

          subject to the following conditions:

                       (i) one of the bailor should be the family
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27925 of 2026(3) dt.03-07-2026
                                                        3/3




                      member/relative of the petitioner who shall provide official

                      document (Aadhar Card/Voter Id/Driving License/Pan Card) to

                      show his/her bona fide;

                                   (ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date

                      before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive

                      dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his

                      bail bond by the Trial Court itself;

                                   (iii) the petitioner shall appear before the concerned

                      police station every month for six months to mark his

                      attendance and at the end of the period a certificate be submitted

                      before the Trial Court;

                                   (iv) the petitioner shall in no way try to induce or

                      promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences,

                      failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for

                      cancellation of the bail bonds;

                                   (v) the petitioner shall desist from committing any

                      criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty

                      to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.



                                                     (Rajiv Roy, J)
vinayak/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.