Patna High Court
Gajendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- PRAVEEN KUMAR
Holding
The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to bond and surety conditions, finding insufficient grounds to deny bail.
Summary
The petitioner, Gajendra Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated as the owner of a motorcycle from which 10 litres of illicit country-made liquor was seized under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act. He contended that the motorcycle had been sold to Bablu Kumar, who was using it at the time of seizure, and that he had no criminal antecedents. The State opposed the bail, arguing that the petitioner could be liable for the offence. The Court examined the facts, noting the petitioner's lack of control over the vehicle at the time of the incident and his claim of being a victim of circumstance. Applying Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, the Court granted anticipatory bail subject to a bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties, with conditions to be satisfied before the Exclusive Special Excise Court.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is liable under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act for the seizure of illicit liquor from a motorcycle he allegedly owned.
- Whether anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioner given the circumstances of ownership and lack of control over the vehicle at the time of seizure.
Legislation cited
- Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita — s. 482(2)
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act — s. 30(a), 41(1)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- illegal liquor
- vehicle ownership
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act
- Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita
- Section 482(2)
- bail conditions
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28001 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-540 Year-2025 Thana- CHHATAUNI District- East Champaran
======================================================
Gajendra Kumar S/o- Manpur Ram @ Manroop Ram Resident of Village-
Belwatiya, Ward No.3, P.S-Piprakothi, District- East Champaran
... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Baidhyanath Thakur, Advocate
For the Opposite Party : Mr. Madan Kumar, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
3 13-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. This application for anticipatory bail arises out
of Chhatauni P.S. Case No. 540 of 2025, registered for the
offence punishable under Section 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar
Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act.
3. As per allegation, 10 liters of country made
liquor was recovered from a motorcycle, which was driven by
the co-accused Raju Mahammad.
4. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the
petitioner that the petitioner has been made accused on the basis
of being the owner of the motorcycle from which the alleged
recovery has been made. It has further been submitted that the
said motorcycle, at the time of seizure, was not under the
control of the petitioner as he had sold the motorcycle to one
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28001 of 2026(3) dt.13-05-2026
2/2
Bablu Kumar, who had assured that he will get the same
transferred in his name in the District Transport Office and,
under that bonafide belief, the petitioner gave his motorcycle to
him, which was being used by Bablu Kumar. The petitioner has
got no criminal antecedents and he has become the victim of the
circumstances.
5. Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer
of anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Heard the parties and perused the record.
7. Considering the facts and circumstances, let the
petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest/surrender
within six weeks from today in the Court below, be released on
bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand)
with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of
the learned Exclusive Special Excise Court-1, East Champaran,
Motihari, in connection with Chhatauni P.S. Case No. 540 of
2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section
482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita.
(Praveen Kumar, J)
Pawan/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.