Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

ASHOK THAKURversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Anticipatory bail may be granted where the allegations do not conclusively implicate the petitioner and mitigating factors exist, subject to conditions under Section 482(2).

Summary

Ashok Thakur applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in an assault on the informant's son, alleged to have been carried out with a Dabiya. The petitioner argued that the incident arose from a dispute over tent erection, that there is a case‑and‑counter‑case, and that the injury report does not specifically link him to the harm. He also highlighted his clean criminal record. The State opposed the bail, citing multiple serious offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. The Court examined the facts, the injury report, and the lack of prior convictions, and concluded that bail could be granted subject to conditions. Accordingly, the Court ordered anticipatory bail on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, to be surrendered within six weeks, under Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriateness of granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner under the circumstances and the offences alleged?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • assault
  • Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • Section 482
  • criminal procedure
  • bail conditions
  • case and counter case

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28067 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2026 Thana- MADHEPUR District- Madhubani
                 ======================================================
                 ASHOK THAKUR Son of Late Kari Thakur Resident of Village - Matras,
                 P.S.- Madhepur, District - Madhubani.
                                                                      ... ... Petitioner
                                                   Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                               ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner     :        Mr. Jaishankar Kumar Yadav, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party :        Mr. Abhay Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   13-05-2026                 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                  2. This application for anticipatory bail arises out

                   of Madhepur P.S. Case No. 10 of 2026 for the offence

                   punishable under Section 1127(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118(1),

                   118(2), 109(1), 74, 76, 303(2), 331(5), 351(2), 352, 3(5) of the

                   Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita.

                                  3. As per the allegation, this petitioner and co-

                   accused Santosh Thakur are alleged to have assaulted the son of

                   the informant on his head by means of Dabiya.

                                  4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

                   that there is case and counter case between the parties and the

                   injury report goes to show that there is one injury upon the

                   injured and that is not specifically attributed to the petitioner. It

                   has further been submitted that the petitioner has also received
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28067 of 2026(3) dt.13-05-2026
                                                      2/2




                    head injuries in the alleged occurrence caused by the informant

                    side and the injury report has been annexed as Annexure-P/3.

                    The alleged occurrence took place suddenly on the question of

                    erection of tent for a function and the petitioner has got no

                    criminal antecedents.

                                    5. Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer

                    of anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

                                 6. Heard the parties and perused the record.

                                 7. Considering the facts and circumstances, let the

                    petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest/surrender

                    within six weeks from today in the Court below, be released on

                    bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand)

                    with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

                    the learned J.M. 1st Class, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani, in

                    connection with Madhepur P.S. Case No. 10 of 2026, subject to

                    the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya

                    Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita.



                                               (Praveen Kumar, J)
Pawan/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.