Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Kiran Kunwar@ Kiran DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court granted bail to both petitioners.

Summary

The petitioners, Kiran Kunwar and Ujjwal Ram, were arrested in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 77.8 litres of illicit country-made liquor and 6 litres of illicit foreign liquor recovered from an open place behind the house of the second petitioner. The petitioners contended that they were innocent, that no liquor was recovered from their possession, and that the police failed to comply with Section 105 of the BNSS while making the seizure. They had been in judicial custody since 29 March 2026 and sought bail, while the State opposed bail, noting a prior criminal case against the second petitioner. After hearing both sides, the Court found the circumstances sufficient to grant bail. The petitioners were ordered to furnish a bail bond of Rs.10,000 each with two sureties, subject to the satisfaction of the Exclusive Special Judge, Excise Court No. I, Rohtas.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
  • Whether the seizure of liquor complied with the procedural requirements of Section 105 of the BNSS.
  • Whether the prior criminal antecedent of petitioner no. 2 warrants denial of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • illicit liquor
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • Section 30(a)
  • seizure procedure
  • Section 105
  • criminal antecedent

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28177 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-129 Year-2026 Thana- AKHODHIGOLA District- Rohtas
                 ======================================================
           1.     Kiran Kunwar@ Kiran Devi W/o Late Dharmendra Ram @ Late
                  Dharmendra Choudhary @ Late Dharam Ram Resident Of Village - Musaie
                  Tola, Ps - Akorhigola, Dist.- Rohtas.
           2.    Ujjwal Ram S/o Late Dharmendra Ram @ Dharmendra Choudhary @ Late
                 Dharam Ram Resident Of Village - Musaie Tola, Ps - Akorhigola, Dist.-
                 Rohtas.

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Sarfraz Ahmad, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Nityanand, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   04-05-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioners have prayed for bail in connection

                   with Akhori Gola P.S. Case No. 129 of 2026 registered for the

                   offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition

                   and Excise Act.

                                3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that

                   altogether 77.8 liters of illicit country made liquor and 06 liters of

                   illicit foreign liquor were recovered behind the house of Ujjwal

                   Ram (petitioner no. 2) from an open place.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28177 of 2026(2) dt.04-05-2026
                                                       2/2




                     committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this

                     case. He also submits that nothing has been recovered from the

                     possession of the petitioner. The witnesses of the seizure list are

                     police personnel and the police has not complied with Section

                     105 of the BNSS while making the seizure. Moreover, the

                     petitioners are languishing in judicial custody since 29.03.2026.

                                  5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

                     for the State and submits that the petitioner no. 1 has no criminal

                     antecedent whereas petitioner no. 2 has criminal antecedent of one

                     case.

                                  6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                     considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

                     inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail.         The above named

                     petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

                     bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) each with two

                     sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

                     Exclusive Special Judge, Excise Court No. I, Rohtas at Sasaram in

                     connection with Akhori Gola P.S. Case No. 129 of 2026.



                                                    (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Sudhanshu/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.