Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

feku Ravidas @ Feku DasversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court allowed the bail application and granted regular bail to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Feku Ravidas, was arrested in connection with a FIR naming fifteen persons for alleged offences under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Substances Act, 2023, including assault and offences relating to causing death. He is alleged to be the principal assailant who struck the deceased with a stone, and has been in custody since 14 July 2025. The petitioner contended that the post‑mortem report showed only a single injury with no fracture and that the victim died twelve days after the incident, arguing that this negates the applicability of section 103 of the Act. The State opposed the bail application, asserting the seriousness of the charges. The Court, after considering the medical report and the elapsed time before death, granted regular bail on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions of appearance. The order expressly limited its observations to the bail application and did not prejudice the merits of the trial.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail despite being charged with multiple offences including those under sections 191, 190, and 103 of the B.N.S., 2023
  • Whether the death of the victim after twelve days negates the offence under section 103 of the B.N.S., 2023

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • criminal procedure
  • Bihar Negotiable Substances Act
  • post‑mortem report
  • section 103
  • assault
  • high court

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28246 of 2026
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-47 Year-2025 Thana- RAMPUR District- Gaya
                 ======================================================
                 Feku Ravidas @ Feku Das Son of Prasad Ravidas @ Prasad Das Resident of
                 Village- Samir Takiya, P.S.- Rampur, District- Gaya Jee.

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                          ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner     :         Mr. Aryan Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party :         Mr. Ganesh Prasad Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   02-07-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the

                   State.

                                  2.        The    petitioner     seeks      regular     bail    in

                   connection with Sessions Trial No.1202 of 2025, arising out of

                   Rampur P.S. Case No.47 of 2025 registered for the offence

                   under sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 118(2),

                   117(2), 74, 109(1), 352, 351(2), 351 and 351(3) of the B.N.S.,

                   2023.

                                  3.        Fifteen persons including the petitioner are

                   named in the F.I.R. The petitioner is alleged to be the main

                   assailant, who is said to have hit the deceased with stone.

                                  4.        The petitioner is in custody since 14.07.2025

                   having clean antecedent.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28246 of 2026(3) dt.02-07-2026
                                            2/3




                          5.      Learned counsel for the petitioner submits

          that the petitioner is innocent and has not committed any

          offence. He further submits that from the postmortem report, it

          appears that the deceased had sustained only one injury but no

          fracture has been detected in the postmortem report.

                          6.      Learned counsel for the petitioner also

          submits that the deceased had died after 12 days of the alleged

          occurrence and therefore, the offence under section 103 of the

          B.N.S. is not made out against the petitioner.

                          7.      Learned APP for the State has vehemently

          opposed the prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail.

                          8.      I have considered the submissions of the

          parties.

                          9.      Considering the postmortem report of the

          deceased and also the fact that the deceased died after 12 days

          of alleged occurrence together with the custody of the petitioner,

          which is from 04.07.2025, this bail application is allowed.

                          10.     Let the petitioner, above named, be released

          on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand)

          with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

          the learned Additional Sessions Judge, XVI, Gaya ji / concerned

          Court below, in connection with Sessions Trial No.1202 of
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28246 of 2026(3) dt.02-07-2026
                                                          3/3




                        2025, arising out of Rampur P.S. Case No.47 of 2025, subject to

                        the condition that he will cooperate in the trial and will appear

                        himself or through his advocate on each and every date fixed in

                        the trial. Failure to appear in the trial on two consecutive dates,

                        will result in cancellation of the bail bonds of the petitioner by

                        the Court below.

                                        11.     It is, however, clarified that the observations

                        made herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail

                        application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at

                        any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not

                        expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.



                                                                (Sandeep Kumar, J)

pawan/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.