Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Kapildev SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner subject to conditions.

Summary

Kapildev Sharma, a 77‑year‑old member of a school managing committee, was implicated in a case (Telhara P.S. Case No. 87 of 2024) alleging irregular appointment of two teachers, one of whom was his son, under IPC sections 420, 120B and 34. The petitioner sought bail, arguing that the appointments were made in 2013, were later cancelled in 2024, that he had no direct involvement, and that he had a clean antecedent. The State contended that as a committee member he bore responsibility for ensuring proper appointments and should have recused himself due to his son’s candidature. The court, considering the petitioner’s advanced age, lack of direct evidence, and the doubtful nature of the allegations, granted bail subject to a bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties and conditions of appearance. The order was made under Section 482(2) of the Bihar Non‑Statutory (B.N.S.S.) and other standard bail conditions.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner, as a member of the School Managing Committee, is liable for the alleged irregular appointment of teachers under IPC sections 420, 120B and 34.
  • Whether bail should be granted in view of the petitioner’s age, clean antecedent and the nature of the allegations.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal conspiracy
  • cheating
  • school appointments
  • managing committee
  • age
  • clean antecedent

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28293 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-87 Year-2024 Thana- TELHARA District- Nalanda
                 ======================================================
                 Kapildev Sharma S/o Late Bachchu Singh R/o Vill. - Mandachh, P.S. -
                 Telhara, Dist. - Nalanda.

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Shivendra Prasad, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Shantanu Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   04-05-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                   2.    In    the    present     case,     the    petitioner      is

                   apprehending his arrest in connection with Telhara P.S. Case

                   No. 87 of 2024 registered for the offences under Sections 420

                   and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

                                      3. As per prosecution case, the School Managing

                   Committee of which the petitioner was a part, appointed two

                   two teachers without advertising post and one of the teachers

                   was the son of the petitioner.

                                      4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this

                   case. The petitioner was a doner to the school and on this

                   account he was made a member of the School Managing
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28293 of 2026(2) dt.04-05-2026
                                            2/3




          Committee at the relevant time. Learned counsel further submits

          that the teachers were appointed in the year 2013 and the

          present case has been lodged in 2024, i.e., after 11 years of the

          alleged appointment. When the irregularity committed in the

          appointment of school teachers has came to the notice, vide

          order dated 05.04.2024, their appointments have been cancelled

          by Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board. Learned counsel further

          submits that two teachers were appointed as per prevailing Rule

          of 1976 on temporary basis. Learned counsel further submits

          that the petitioner is a 77 years old person having clean

          antecedent. There is no direct allegation for any wrong being

          committed by the petitioner.

                       5. Learned APP opposes the submission made on

          behalf of the petitioner. Learned APP submits that being the

          member of the School Managing Committee, the petitioner was

          responsible to see that the appointments was being made in

          proper manner and when the son of the petitioner was himself a

          candidate, he should have recused from the functioning of the

          Managing Committee.

                       6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and

          submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the

          age of the petitioner, his clean antecedent and doubtful nature of
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28293 of 2026(2) dt.04-05-2026
                                                        3/3




                      allegation, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his

                      arrest or surrender before the court concerned within a period of

                      eight weeks from today, be released on bail, on furnishing bail

                      bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two

                      sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned

                      Additional          Chief          Judicial          Magistrate-I,   Hilsa

                      (Nalanda)/concerned court in connection with Telhara P.S. Case

                      No. 87 of 2024, subject to the condition as laid down under

                      Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. and other following conditions :

                                                      (i) One of the bailors will be a close

                                                      relative of the petitioner.

                                                      (ii) The petitioner will remain present

                                                      on each and every date fixed by the

                                                      court below, if so required by the

                                                      learned trial court.



                                                (Arun Kumar Jha, J)
DKS/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.