Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Shitanshu Kumar @ Teni KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court granted regular bail to the petitioner, directing release upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties.

Summary

The petitioner, Shitanshu Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case alleging that he restrained and assaulted the minor son and daughter of an informant at his shop. The prosecution alleged offences under multiple sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, the POCSO Act, the Child Labour Act and the Juvenile Justice Act. The petitioner’s counsel argued that he is innocent, that the victims’ injury reports show assault by unknown parties, and that the matter has been compromised, while also noting his prolonged pre‑trial detention since 13 January 2026. The State opposed the grant of regular bail, citing the seriousness of the charges. After hearing both sides, the High Court considered the facts and circumstances and ordered the petitioner’s release on regular bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties, thereby disposing of the bail petition.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail should be granted in a case involving offences under the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, POCSO Act, Child Labour Act and Juvenile Justice Act.
  • Whether the petitioner poses a risk of fleeing, tampering with evidence, or committing further offences.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • regular bail
  • POCSO
  • child labour
  • juvenile justice
  • criminal procedure
  • Bihar

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28307 of 2026
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-21 Year-2026 Thana- BIHAR District- Nalanda
                 ======================================================
                 Shitanshu Kumar @ Teni Kumar S/o Sri Satish Kumar R/o Mohalla- Etwari
                 Bazar, P.S.- Bihar, Dist.- Nalanda

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    XXXX W/o XXXX R/o vill - Sohsarai, Krishnanagar, P.S.- Sohsarai, Distt.-
                 Nalanda

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Ashok Kumar Gupta, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Prem Kumar Jha, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   05-05-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case

                   registered for the offence punishable under sections 126(2),

                   127(2), 115(2), 109(1), 137(2), 140(3), 118, 74 and 3(5) of BNS,

                   Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act and Section 14(1) of Child

                   Labour Act and Section 79 of Juvenile Justice Act.

                                3. The case of the prosecution is that the minor

                   daughter and son of the informant have gone to the shop of

                   Satish Kumar for work. They did not return for a considerable

                   moment, they were searched and a call was made on dial 112.

                   They came to know that the son and daughter both have been
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28307 of 2026(2) dt.05-05-2026
                                            2/3




          sent to hospital and the informant went there. His son and his

          daughter disclosed that they were being restrained in the house

          of Satish, the father of this petitioner and were brutally

          assaulted.

                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

          petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Learned

          counsel for the petitioner has submitted that from perusal of the

          injury report placed at Annexures-2 and 3, it is clear that both

          the son and daughter of the informant had physical assault,

          headache and body ache. It has further been submitted that due

          to intervention of well-wishers, the parties have compromised

          the case. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial

          custody since 13.01.2026.

                       5. Learned APP appearing for the State has

          vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail.

                       6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

          considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is

          inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

          petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with

          Bihar P.S. Case No. 21 of 2026 on furnishing bail bond of

          Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

          each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28307 of 2026(2) dt.05-05-2026
                                                        3/3




                      IVth-cum-Exclusive Special Judge, POCSO, Bihar Sharif,

                      Nalanda.



                                            (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Shubham/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.