Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Aditya Kumar @ JohnsonversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioner, finding that the confessional statements of co‑accused are inadmissible and no contraband was recovered from him.

Summary

The Patna High Court considered a bail application filed by Aditya Kumar, who was implicated in an NDPS case (Sections 8(c), 21(b) and 29) after 51 grams of contraband were seized from co‑accused Nitish Kumar and Vishal Kumar. The petitioner argued that he was innocent and that his name only appeared in the confessional statements of the co‑accused, which, according to the Supreme Court’s decision in Tofan Singh v. State of Tamil Nadu, have no evidentiary value in NDPS matters. The State opposed bail, citing three prior criminal cases against the petitioner. After hearing both sides, the Court held that the lack of any material recovered from the petitioner and the inadmissibility of the co‑accused’s confessions warranted bail. Consequently, the Court ordered the petitioner’s release on a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail under the NDPS Act when the only link to the contraband is a confessional statement of co‑accused.
  • Whether confessional statements of co‑accused have any legal value in NDPS cases as per Supreme Court precedent.
  • Whether the petitioner’s prior criminal antecedents preclude the grant of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • NDPS Act
  • confessional statement
  • co‑accused
  • prior criminal antecedent

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28371 of 2026
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-76 Year-2026 Thana- PATNA CITY CHOWK District- Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Aditya Kumar @ Johnson, S/o Ravindra Kumar, R/o Kaimashikoh, PS-
                 Chowk, Dist- Patna
                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                              Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                              ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Arya, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   05-05-2026                  Heard learned Senior counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in a case

                   registered for the offence punishable under Sections 8(c), 21(b)

                   and 29 of the NDPS Act.

                                3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that from

                   the possession of Nitish Kumar and Vishal Kumar, altogether 51

                   grams of smack like contraband was recovered.

                                4. Learned Senior counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has

                   committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this

                   case. The name of this petitioner has surfaced in the

                   confessional statement of these two co-accused persons Nitish

                   and Vishal from whom the contraband was recovered. It has

                   further been submitted that nothing has been recovered from the
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28371 of 2026(2) dt.05-05-2026
                                                         2/2




                       possession of this petitioner. It has further been submitted that in

                       view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case

                       of Tofan Singh vs. State of Tamil Nadu, the confessional

                       statement of the co-accused even in the NDPS cases has got no

                       legal value. Petitioner is in judicial custody since 10.02.2026.

                                    5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

                       for the State and has submitted that petitioner is having criminal

                       antecedent of three cases of different nature.

                                    6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                       considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

                       inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

                       petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

                       bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties

                       of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court of learned

                       Sessions Judge/Special Judge (N.D.P.S.), Patna in connection

                       with Chowk P.S. Case No.76 of 2026.


                                                     (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)

lata/-
U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.