Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Pawan Kumar Mandal @ Pawan MandalversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner subject to a bond of Rs.10,000 and specified conditions.

Summary

Pawan Kumar Mandal, a middle school teacher, was arrested on 14 February 2026 in connection with an FIR alleging forgery of documents and offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B) of the IPC. The petitioner contended that he has a clean antecedent, that the FIR is fabricated, and that his certificates were verified as genuine by the concerned university. He also highlighted his 15 years of service and recent successful teacher evaluation. The State and the Vigilance Department opposed bail, noting that the petitioner had not resigned from his post. The Court, after considering the clean antecedent and the circumstances, granted bail on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and imposed conditions regarding cooperation with the trial and non‑tampering with evidence.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused in a case involving offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B) of the IPC, considering his clean antecedent and the nature of the allegations.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • forgery
  • IPC sections 420 467 468 471 120B
  • clean antecedent
  • criminal procedure
  • middle school teacher
  • verification of documents

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28757 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-18 Year-2026 Thana- BABUBARHI District- Madhubani
                 ======================================================
                 Pawan Kumar Mandal @ Pawan Mandal Son of Late Jangbahadur Mandal
                 Resident of Village - Math Khudarkhala, Police Station - Babubarhi, District -
                 Madhubani

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 1. The State of Bihar
                 2. The Superintendent of Police, Vigilance, Patna, Bihar.

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Vindhyachal Singh, Sr.Advocate
                                          :      Mr.Vipin Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Anand Kishore Choudhary, APP
                 For the Vigilance         :     Mr.Arvind Kumar, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   29-04-2026                          Heard Mr. Vindhyachal Singh, learned senior

                   counsel for the petitioner, Mr.Arvind Kumar, learned counsel for

                   the Vigilance and Mr.Anand Kishore Choudhary, learned A.P.P.

                   for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since

                   14.02.2026 in connection with Babubarhi P.S. Case No. 18 of

                   2026, F.I.R. dated 08.01.2026 registered for the offence

                   punishable under Sections 420,467,468,471,120(B) of IPC.

                                 3. Allegation against the petitioner is that he has

                   continued to serve as a Middle School Mauahi, by submitting a

                   forged documents.

                                 4. Learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28757 of 2026(3) dt.29-04-2026
                                            2/4




          submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent. The allegation

          as alleged in the FIR is false and fabricated and the petitioner

          has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. It appears

          that pursuance to the order passed in CWJC No.15459/2014

          (PIL), the State Government has filed the present FIR against

          the petitioner and similarly situated like persons in all over the

          State of Bihar. As per allegation in the FIR, the certificate of the

          petitioner was mismatched with the record of the institution.

          Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that after

          joining the service in question, the authority has sent the

          certificate of the petitioner to the concerned University/

          Institution and the same was found genuine. Learned senior

          counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner was

          working since last 15 years and pursuant to the present FIR the

          petitioner is behind the bar and apart from the aforesaid, the

          petitioner has already passed the Elementary Teacher Evaluation

          Examination which was conducted in the State of Bihar and the

          petitioner is in custody since 14.02.2026.

                       5. Learned counsel for the Vigilance and learned APP

          for the State have opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner

          and submits that other similar cases, the petitioner has come

          before this Court after resignation from the post in question but
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28757 of 2026(3) dt.29-04-2026
                                            3/4




          in the present case the petitioner has not resigned as yet.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid fact and petitioner has

          clean antecedent, let the petitioner, above named, be released on

          bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with

          two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

          learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani in connection

          with Babubarhi P.S. Case No. 18 of 2026, with the following

          conditions:-

                       (I) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be

          properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court

          and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and

          on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient

          reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

                       (II) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the

          witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move

          for cancellation of bail.

                       (III) And, further condition that the court below shall

          verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at

          any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his

          criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for

          cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the

          acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28757 of 2026(3) dt.29-04-2026
                                                           4/4




                         shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of

                         verification.



                                                (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Nitesh/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.