Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sudha KumariversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The second modification petition is not proper and is dismissed.

Summary

Sudha Kumari was ordered by the Patna High Court to surrender on 21 May 2025 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 26564. She filed a modification application which was allowed on 26 September 2025, altering the surrender terms. The petitioner failed to surrender within the new deadline and subsequently filed a second modification application seeking further relief. The Court examined whether a second modification was permissible after the earlier modification had already been granted and the petitioner had not complied. Finding that the second application was improper, the Court dismissed the petition.

Issues considered

  • Whether a second modification application is maintainable when the petitioner has already been granted a modification and has failed to comply with the order.

Subjects

  • modification of order
  • surrender
  • criminal miscellaneous procedure
  • non‑compliance
  • procedural law

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 29078 of 2026
                                              In
                             CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26564 of 2025
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-662 Year-2024 Thana- DANAPUR District- Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Sudha Kumari W/O Mantu Singh R/O Village- Mustafapur, P.S- Khagaul,
                 Distt.- Patna.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Ms. Nirmala Kumari, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   01-05-2026                    Heard Mr. Mukesh Kumar, learned counsel for the

                   petitioner and Ms. Nirmala Kumari, learned Additional Public

                   Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The present modification application has been filed

                   for modification of the order dated 26.09.2025 passed in Cr.

                   Misc. No. 56748 of 2025.

                                3. The petitioner had earlier approached this Court for

                   modifying the order dated 21.05.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No.

                   26564 of 2025 and the same was allowed vide order dated

                   26.09.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 56748 of 2025.

                                4. Despite of aforesaid, the petitioner has not

                   surrendered within the stipulated time and she has again sought

                   modification of the order dated 26.09.2025 passed in Cr. Misc.
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 29078 of 2026(2) dt.01-05-2026
                                                        2/2




                      No. 56748 of 2025. It appears that the petitioner has not chosen

                      to comply the order of this Court dated 21.05.2025 passed in Cr.

                      Misc. No. 26564 of 2025 and filing second modification

                      application, though the order dated 21.05.2025 had already

                      modified by this Court vide order dated 26.09.2025 passed in

                      Cr. Misc. No. 56748 of 2025.

                                   5. In view of the aforesaid, second modification

                      petition is not proper.

                                   6. Accordingly, this modification application stands

                      dismissed.



                                             (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Suruchi/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.