Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

ASHOK YADAVversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner with specified conditions.

Summary

Ashok Yadav was implicated in a case where 5 litres of country-made liquor were recovered from a motorcycle he owned, which was being driven by two co-accused who were seized at the spot. The petitioner claimed he had no knowledge of the liquor and that the co-accused had borrowed the bike for urgent work, asserting his innocence. He sought anticipatory bail, arguing that the recovery was from the co-accused's possession and not from his conscious control. The State opposed the bail, contending the seriousness of the offence under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. The Court, after considering the submissions, granted anticipatory bail subject to a Rs.10,000 bond, two sureties, and several conditions including cooperation with the trial and non‑tampering with evidence, invoking its powers under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriateness of granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner under the circumstances of the case?
  • Whether the petitioner’s ownership of the motorcycle, without conscious possession of the liquor, suffices to justify bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • excise law
  • liquor seizure
  • motor vehicle ownership
  • false implication
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29173 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-12 Year-2026 Thana- KORANSARAI District- Buxar
                 ======================================================
                 Ashok Yadav, S/O Sohan Yadav, R/O Vill - Kamdharpur, P.S.- Koransarai,
                 Distt.- Buxar
                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s

                                                      Versus

                 The State of Bihar
                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Arun Kumar Gupta, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Rina Sinha, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   06-05-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with

                   Koransarai P.S. Case No. 12 of 2026 dated 24.01.2026 instituted

                   for the offence punishable under Sections 30(a) of Bihar

                   Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.

                                3. Allegation is of recovery of total 5 litre country

                   made Liquor from a motorcycle bearing Reg. No. BR4457902

                   which was being driven by two co-accused persons who were

                   apprehended at the spot.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this

                   case. It is further submitted that nothing has been recovered

                   from the conscious possession of the petitioner rather the said
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29173 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026
                                            2/3




          liquor was recovered from the possession of apprehended two

          co-accused persons. The petitioner has been made accused in

          this case only on the basis that he is owner of the said

          motorcycle. It is further submitted that the co-accused Hareram

          took motorcycle from the petitioner for doing his urgent work

          and as such, the petitioner had no knowledge about the intention

          of the co-accused. The petitioner has no role in this incident.

          Lastly, it has been submitted that petitioner has three criminal

          cases against him.

                       5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has

          opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

                       6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of

          the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in

          the event of arrest / surrender of the petitioner within a period of

          six weeks from today, in connection with Koransarai P.S. Case

          No. 12 of 2026, he will be released on bail upon furnishing bail

          bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the

          like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special

          Excise Court No. 1, Buxar subject to condition as laid down

          under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. as well as the following

          conditions:-

                          1. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29173 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026
                                                       3/3




                                     be properly represented on each and every date

                                     fixed by the Court and on his absence on two

                                     consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail

                                     bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

                                     2. One of the bailors will be his own blood relation,

                                     preferably father, mother, brother, sister and or his

                                     wife.

                                     3. The bailor shall also state on affidavit that he

                                     will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is

                                     made accused in any other case of similar nature

                                     after his release in the present case and thereafter

                                     the court below will be at liberty to initiate the

                                     proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of

                                     misuse.

                                     4. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the

                                     witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at

                                     liberty to move for cancellation of bail.


                                                                      (Khatim Reza, J)

premchand/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.