Patna High Court
Birendra Mishra @ Virendra MishraversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- ALLOWED
- Bench
- KHATIM REZA
Holding
The court allowed bail to the petitioner, subject to stringent conditions, under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023.
Summary
The petitioner, Birendra Mishra, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 45 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 561.27 litres of illicit foreign liquor from a truck parked near a co-accused's poultry farm. Mishra contended that he had no possession of the liquor, no nexus with the truck, and was falsely implicated based solely on a chowkidar's testimony, despite having eight other criminal cases pending on bail. The State opposed his bail, arguing the seriousness of the offence. The High Court, after considering the submissions, ordered that Mishra be released on bail upon furnishing a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties and complying with several conditions, including regular reporting to the police and cooperation with the trial. The application for bail was therefore allowed.
Issues considered
- Whether bail can be granted to an accused under Sections 30(a) and 45 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act in view of the nature of the alleged offence and the petitioner’s pending criminal cases.
- Whether the petitioner’s lack of direct possession or nexus with the seized illicit liquor justifies the grant of bail.
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 482(2)
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act — s. 30(a), 45
Subjects
- bail
- prohibition law
- excise
- illicit liquor
- criminal procedure
- pending cases
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29185 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-101 Year-2019 Thana- KOPA District- Saran
======================================================
Birendra Mishra @ Virendra Mishra S/o Vikram Mishra R/o Village - Rith,
P.S.- Ekma, District- Saran. At present- T-31, East Mehram Nagar, Palam
Airport, Moradabad Pahari, Delhi Cantt, South West Delhi, Delhi- 110010.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anjani Parashar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs.Renuka Ratnakar, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA
ORAL ORDER
2 07-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with
Kopa PS. Case No. 101 of 2019 dated 6.7.2019 instituted under
Sections 30(a)/45 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
3. The allegation is of recovery of 561.27 litres of
illicit foreign liquor from a truck bearing Reg. No. UP-50BT
2633 parked near the poultry farm of co-accused Vikash Singh.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the
present case. It is further submitted that no incriminating article
has been recovered either from the conscious possession of the
petitioner or from his house. It is further submitted that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29185 of 2026(2) dt.07-05-2026
2/3
alleged recovery of illicit liquor was made from a truck parked
near the poultry farm of co-accused Vikash Singh and the
petitioner has no nexus either with the said truck or with the
seized illicit liquor. According to learned counsel, the petitioner
has been made an accused merely on the basis of the disclosure
made by the local chowkidar, namely Ramji Ray, on account of
his past criminal antecedents. Lastly, it is submitted that though
eight criminal cases are pending against the petitioner, he is on
bail in all those cases.
5. Learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail.
6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of
the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in
the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within
six weeks from today, the petitioner be released on bail upon
furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two
sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned
Exclusive Special Excise Court No. 3,Saran at Chapra, in Kopa
PS. Case No. 101 of 2019, subject to the conditions laid down in
Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023
and further (i) that the petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and
shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by
the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29185 of 2026(2) dt.07-05-2026
3/3
sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court
below, (ii) that one of the bailors will be his own blood relation,
preferably father, mother, brother, sister and or his wife, (iii) that
the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the
court concerned if the petitioner is made accused in any other
case of similar nature after his release in the present case and
thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the
proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse (iv) that
if the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in
that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for
cancellation of bail and (v) that the petitioner will appear before
the SHO of concerned PS in the first week of each month till
conclusion of the trial.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Khatim Reza, J)
shyambihari/-
U
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.