Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Fulamati Devi @ Fulmati DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that the petitioner is entitled to regular bail.

Summary

The Patna High Court considered an application for regular bail filed by Fulamati Devi, mother‑in‑law of a deceased woman who was allegedly killed in a dowry‑related dispute. She was charged under Sections 80, 103 and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita for the murder, while the husband of the deceased, who allegedly committed the killing, is already in judicial custody. The petitioner argued that she had no involvement in the crime, possessed a clean record, and that there was no allegation of tampering with evidence. The State opposed bail, contending the seriousness of the offences. After weighing the facts, the court noted the petitioner’s gender, the custody of the principal accused, and the absence of any incriminating conduct, and ordered her release on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties. The application was allowed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is eligible for regular bail under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita for the offences charged
  • Whether the circumstances, including the custody of the co‑accused, the petitioner’s gender and clean antecedents, justify granting bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • dowry death
  • murder
  • gender considerations
  • Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29256 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-304 Year-2025 Thana- UCHKAGAON District- Gopalganj
                 ======================================================
                 Fulamati Devi @ Fulmati Devi W/O Late Raghunath sah R/O Harkesh Barari,
                 P.s.- Uchkagaon, Dist.- Gopalganj.
                                                                           ... ... Petitioner
                                                    Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                    ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner     :        Mr. Sonu Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party :        Mr. Anil Kumar Singh No. 1, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   24-06-2026                 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                               2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with

                   Uchkagaon P.S. Case No. 304 of 2025, dated 02.08.2025,

                   registered for the offence under Sections 80, 103 and 3(5) of the

                   Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita.

                               3. As per the allegation, petitioner, being the husband

                   of the deceased, along with co-accused persons killed the

                   daughter of the informant for non-fulfillment of dowry demand.

                               4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has

                   submitted that the petitioner is the mother-in-law of the

                   deceased. It has been submitted at the Bar that the husband of

                   the deceased, namely, Rambabu Sah, is in judicial custody. It

                   has further been submitted that the petitioner used to reside
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29256 of 2026(4) dt.24-06-2026
                                            2/3




          separately in mess and residence and has got no concern with

          the day-to-day affairs of the deceased and her husband. It has

          further been submitted that the deceased was killed by her

          husband by striking hammer on her head repeatedly and the said

          murder weapon, the hammer, which was used in the murder,

          was also recovered pursuant to his confession. It has further

          been submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 03.08.2025

          and has got clean antecedents. It has lastly been submitted that

          charge-sheet has been filed in this case and there is no allegation

          of tampering against the petitioner.

                       5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed

          the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

                       6. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused

          the record.

                       7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case

          and the fact that the petitioner happens to be a lady and the

          husband of the deceased, as submitted at the Bar, is in custody,

          let the, above named, petitioner be released on bail on

          furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two

          sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned

          Additional Sessions Judge-IX, Gopalganj, in connection with

          Uchkagaon P.S. Case No. 304 of 2025.
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29256 of 2026(4) dt.24-06-2026
                                                      3/3




                                 8. The application stands allowed accordingly.



                                               (Praveen Kumar, J)
Pawan/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.