Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Md. YakubversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Md. Yakub, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly transporting 225 litres of illicit liquor in a Swift Dezire. The police seized the vehicle and liquor based on secret information, but the petitioner claimed he neither owned the vehicle nor had possession of the liquor and has no prior criminal record. The court examined the submissions of counsel and noted the lack of criminal antecedent and ownership. Considering these factors, the court was inclined to grant anticipatory bail. The application was allowed, directing the petitioner to furnish a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to Section 438(2) of the CrPC.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioner under Section 438 of the CrPC despite allegations under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • Whether the petitioner’s lack of vehicle ownership and absence of criminal antecedent justify the grant of anticipatory bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • prohibition law
  • excise
  • illicit liquor
  • criminal procedure
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29277 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-15 Year-2026 Thana- Araria Sangram District- Madhubani
                 ======================================================
                 Md. Yakub S/O Kadi Nat R/O Village- Islampur, P.S- Jhanjharpur, District -
                 Madhubani.

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Sanjay Kumar Jha
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Rana Randhir Singh
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   06-05-2026         1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                            Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                       2.   This application for grant of anticipatory bail arises out of

                            Arariya Sangram Police Station Case No. 15 of 2026,

                            dated 24.02.2026, disclosing offence under Section 30(a)

                            of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

                       3.   That the prosecution case, in brief, is that during vehicle

                            checking on secret information that the petitioner is going

                            towards Jhanjharpur with Swift Dezire car carrying illicit

                            liquor. When signed to stop, the driver of the said car

                            succeeded in fleeing away after abandoning the vehicle.

                            Upon search from the vehicle, total 225 litres of Nepali

                            country-made liquor was recovered and vehicle was

                            seized, bearing no. BR01-BH-3157.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29277 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026
                                            2/3




              4.   Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case

                   due to oblique motive and on the basis of secret

                   information. He next submits that the vehicle, in question,

                   does not belong to the petitioner and illicit liquor has not

                   been recovered from conscious possession of the

                   petitioner and/or vehicle belonging to him. The petitioner

                   has got no criminal antecedent.

              5.   Regards being had to the submission advanced by learned

                   counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the

                   fact that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and

                   he is not the owner of the vehicle from where illicit liquor

                   has been recovered, I am inclined to grant the petitioner

                   privilege of anticipatory bail.

              6.   This application is, accordingly, allowed.

              7.   Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest

                   or surrender before the Court below within four weeks, be

                   released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-

                   (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each

                   to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Court Special

                   Judge Excise, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani, in connection

                   with Arariya Sangram Police Station Case No. 15 of
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29277 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026
                                                        3/3




                              2026, subject to the condition laid down under Section

                              438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.



                                               (Anil Kumar Sinha, J)
ashwani/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.