Patna High Court
Mosim Ansari @ Mosin AnsariversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
- Bench
- SANDEEP KUMAR
Holding
The court dismissed the bail application, refusing regular bail to the petitioner.
Summary
Mosim Ansari applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 103(1) and 238 of the BNS, relating to an alleged crime committed with the wife of the deceased due to an illicit relationship. The FIR was initially filed against an unknown person, but during investigation the petitioner gave a self‑inculpatory statement and was arrested on 11 May 2025. The prosecution highlighted the seriousness of the offences. The High Court, after hearing the parties, considered the gravity of the alleged offences and was not inclined to grant bail. Consequently, the bail application was dismissed.
Issues considered
- Whether regular bail should be granted to the petitioner under Sections 103(1) and 238 of the BNS considering the gravity of the alleged offences
Legislation cited
- BNS — s. 103(1), 238
Subjects
- regular bail
- gravity of offence
- self‑inculpatory statement
- illicit relationship
- Sections 103(1) BNS
- Section 238 BNS
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2930 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-142 Year-2025 Thana- KUDRA District- Kaimur (Bhabua)
======================================================
Mosim Ansari @ Mosin Ansari S/O Late Nesar Ansari R/O Village- Barri
Nawatoli, P.S- Puso, Distt.- Gumala (Jharkhand).
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajani Kant Pandey
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ram Anurag Singh
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
3 25-03-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with
Sessions Trial No. 334 of 2025 arising out of Kudra P.S. Case
No. 142 of 2025 registered for the offence under Sections
103(1) / 238 of the BNS.
3. As per the prosecution case, the FIR was registered
against unknown. Subsequently, during investigation, the
petitioner was arrested and he has given his self-inculpatory
statement that he and the wife of the deceased have committed
the crime because they were having an illicit relationship.
4. The petitioner is in custody since 11.05.2025.
5. Considering the gravity of the offence, this Court is
not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, this application is dismissed.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Vikas/-
U
Checking your session…