Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Keshawar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted regular bail to the petitioner, subject to a bond and conditions, as no incriminating article was found against him and he has no antecedent under the Act.

Summary

The petitioner, Keshawar Singh, applied for regular bail in a case under section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, where 60 litres of country liquor were seized from his tractor during a raid, though the driver escaped. The prosecution alleged possession of illicit liquor, but no incriminating article was recovered from the petitioner’s possession or vehicle, and he has no prior record under the Act. The petitioner argued he was falsely implicated merely as the registered owner of the vehicle. The court, after hearing both sides, noted the absence of any seized contraband linked to the petitioner and his clean antecedent, and therefore ordered his release on bail. Bail was conditioned on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and a provision for cancellation if a criminal antecedent under the Act later emerges.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail under section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 given the facts of the case.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • section 30(a)
  • seizure of liquor
  • false implication
  • criminal antecedent
  • regular bail

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29314 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-104 Year-2025 Thana- Amhara P.S. (I.I.T.A. Bihta) District-
                                                          Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Keshawar Singh S/o Lt. Keshav Prasad Singh Resident Of Village - Pipra, P.s.
                 - Udwant Nagar, Dist. - Bhojpur.
                                                                            ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                  Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                     ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :          Mr. Arvind Prasad Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :          Mr. Narsingh Tanti, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   07-05-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the parties.

                                 2. The petitioner has preferred this application for

                   grant of regular bail in connection with IIT Amhara P.S. Case

                   no. 104 of 2025 registered under section 30(a) of the Bihar

                   Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

                                 3. As per the prosecution case, on information having

                   been received and a raid being conducted, 60 litres of country

                   liquor was recovered from the tractor in question, however the

                   driver of the vehicle managed to escape.

                                 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case in course of

                   investigation only for the reason that he happens to be the registered

                   owner of the seized vehicle. No incriminating article has been

                   recovered either from his possession or from his vehicle. He is in
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29314 of 2026(2) dt.07-05-2026
                                                       2/2




                     custody since 6.3.2026 and has no criminal antecedent.

                                  5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

                     for the State.

                                  6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                     taking into consideration the allegation in the FIR, no

                     incriminating article having been recovered from the petitioner’s

                     possession, the petitioner being in custody since 6.3.2026 and

                     specially his not having any antecedent under the Bihar

                     Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, the Court directs the petitioner

                     to be enlarged on bail in connection with IIT Amhara P.S. Case no.

                     104 of 2025 (Special Excise Case no.1506 of 2025) on furnishing

                     bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of

                     the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special

                     Excise Judge, Danapur, Patna on the following condition:

                                  (i) If it subsequently transpires that the petitioner has

                     a criminal antecedent under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise

                     Act, 2016, the prosecution will be at liberty to move this Court

                     for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.



                                                 (Partha Sarthy, J)
sauravkrsinha/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.