Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Doman RaiversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner with specified conditions.

Summary

Petitioner Doman Rai was arrested on 12 February 2026 in connection with an illegal liquor manufacturing operation discovered during a police raid in Diwantok Diyara, Vaishali. The prosecution alleged that he, along with others, was involved in producing 300 litres of country-made liquor and possessed equipment for the illicit trade, invoking Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act. The petitioner argued that he has a clean antecedent, was implicated only on suspicion, and that the police failed to comply with mandatory provisions of Sections 103 and 105 of the BNSS, 2023. The court examined the facts, noted the lack of direct evidence linking the petitioner to the seized liquor, and considered his clean record. Accordingly, the court granted bail on a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, subject to conditions of cooperation, presence in court, and non‑tampering with evidence, while allowing the lower court to verify his antecedents.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail despite the allegations under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act.
  • Whether non‑compliance of Sections 103 and 105 of BNSS, 2023, warrants bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • illegal liquor
  • prohibition law
  • excise
  • criminal procedure
  • seizure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29556 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-35 Year-2026 Thana- GANGABRIDGE District- Vaishali
                 ======================================================
                 Doman Rai Son of Late Lala Rai Resident of Village - Rajaso, P.S.- Bidupur,
                 District - Vaishali

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                          ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Ashok Kumar
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Khurshid Anwar
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   04-05-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                               2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since

                   12.02.2026 in connection with Ganga Bridge P.S. Case No. 35

                   of 2026 for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) and

                   30(c) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act.

                               3. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on

                   11.02.2026, the informant along with his police team was on

                   patrolling duty and conducting raid against the illegal liquor

                   traders at village Diwantok and in the meantime got information

                   that illegal liquor manufacturing unit has been running in East-

                   South direction of Diwantok diyara region situated near bank of

                   river Ganga by Doman Rai, Lalan Rai, Manki Rai, Birju Kumar,

                   Bhullu Kumar. To verify the said information and necessary
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29556 of 2026(2) dt.04-05-2026
                                            2/4




          action police team reached near at Diwantok diyara region

          situated near bank of river Ganga and saw that five to six

          persons started running away from a liqour bhatti on seeing the

          police team who were tried to be apprehended out of which one

          person was apprehended and other persons managed to flee

          away from the place of occurrence taking benefit of ikri field

          and river. On inquiry, the apprehended person disclosed his

          name as Doman Rai and he also disclosed the names of fleeing

          persons as Lalan Rai, Manki Rai, Birju Kumar, Bhullu Kumar.

          Thereafter, on search of place of occurrence, a total of 300 liter

          country made liquor and 10,000 liter of raw material used for

          preparing liquor is also found there but 10,000 liter of raw

          material was destroyed at the place of seizure itself. One

          aluminum pipe and one plastic pipe were also recovered from

          the place of occurrence.

                      4.    Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

          petitioner has clean antecedent and it appears from the FIR as

          well as seizure list that recovery has been made from the place

          of occurrence namely, Diwantonk Diyara, Ikri field and the

          petitioner has no role at all in the present occurrence and he has

          been made an accused in the present case on the basis of

          suspicion. It is next submitted that there is non-compliance of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29556 of 2026(2) dt.04-05-2026
                                            3/4




          mandatory provisions of Sections 103 and 105 of BNSS, 2023

          and petitioner is in custody since 12.02.2026

                      5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State

          has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances,

          let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing

          bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of

          the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive

          Special Excise Court No. 1-cum- Additional District and

          Sessions Judge, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Ganga

          Bridge P.S. Case No. 35 of 2026, subject to the following

          conditions:-

                       i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be

          properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court

          and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and

          on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient

          reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

                       ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the

          witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to

          move for cancellation of bail.

                       iii. And further condition that the court below shall

          verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29556 of 2026(2) dt.04-05-2026
                                                       4/4




                     any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his

                     criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for

                     cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the

                     acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order

                     shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of

                     verification.



                                            (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Gaurav Sinha/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.