Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Noor Alam @ Md. Noor AlamversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner subject to specified conditions.

Summary

Petitioner Noor Alam was arrested in connection with a dowry death case (Sections 80(2), 108, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023) alleging he and his family tortured his daughter-in-law, leading to her suicide. The petitioner claimed he was in Delhi at the time of the incident and asserted his innocence, arguing he was falsely implicated merely as the husband of the deceased. The prosecution opposed bail, highlighting the seriousness of the offence and the petitioner’s prior criminal antecedent. The court considered the facts, the petitioner’s claim of alibi, and the need to ensure trial cooperation. It granted bail on a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, imposing conditions of court attendance, non‑tampering with evidence, and verification of criminal antecedents.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused in a dowry death case under Sections 80(2), 108, and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023.
  • Whether the petitioner’s alleged alibi and prior criminal antecedent affect the bail decision.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • dowry death
  • Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita
  • criminal antecedent
  • alibi
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29628 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-37 Year-2026 Thana- THAKURGANJ District- Kishanganj
                 ======================================================
                 Noor Alam @ Md. Noor Alam S/o Mujibur @ Mujibur Alam R/o Village -
                 Jirangachh, P.S - Thakurganj, District – Kishanganj



                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar



                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Ravi Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   05-05-2026                        Heard Mr. Ravi Kumar, learned counsel for the

                   petitioner as well as Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, learned

                   Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                               2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since

                   26.02.2026 in connection with Thakurganj P.S. Case No.37 of

                   2026, F.I.R. dated 11.02.2026 for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 80(2), 108, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023.

                               3. According to the prosecution’s case, the informant

                   has alleged that, due to continuous torture inflicted by the

                   petitioner and his family members in connection with demands

                   for dowry, his daughter was driven to commit suicide.

                               4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29628 of 2026(2) dt.05-05-2026
                                            2/3




          petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the

          present case merely on the basis that petitioner is husband of the

          deceased. It appears from the FIR that the alleged occurrence

          took place in the house of the father of the deceased and

          petitioner was not present at the place of occurrence rather he

          was at Delhi for earing livelihood for his family, therefore it

          appears that petitioner has no role at all in the present

          occurrence and the deceased has committed suicide herself and

          the petitioner is in custody since 26.02.2026.

                      5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has

          vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and

          submits that petitioner is husband of the deceased and apart

          from that the petitioner carries one criminal antecedent other

          than the present one but fairly submits on the basis of

          paragraph-3 of the bail application that the petitioner is on bail

          in the said matter.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances,

          let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing

          bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of

          the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief

          Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj in connection with Thakurganj

          P.S. Case No.37 of 2026, subject to the following conditions:-
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29628 of 2026(2) dt.05-05-2026
                                                        3/3




                                   i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be

                      properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court

                      and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and

                      on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient

                      reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

                                   ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the

                      witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to

                      move for cancellation of bail.

                                   iii. And further condition that the court below shall

                      verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at

                      any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his

                      criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for

                      cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the

                      acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order

                      shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of

                      verification.



                                             (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Suruchi/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.