Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Bhado PanditversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

Holding

The Court allowed anticipatory bail to the petitioners subject to specified conditions.

Summary

The petitioners, a family of four from Bhagwanpur, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (PS No. 221 of 2025) alleging assault on an informant and his family under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. They claimed innocence, stating the injury caused by petitioner No. 3 was minor and that they have a prior criminal antecedent but no serious offence. The State opposed the bail application. The Court, noting the advanced age of petitioner No. 1 and that petitioners No. 2 and 4 are women, as well as the simple nature of the injury, granted anticipatory bail subject to a Rs 10,000 bond, two sureties, verification of antecedents, and compliance with Section 438 of the CrPC and Section 482 of the BNSS. The bail order also stipulated that if petitioners No. 1 or 3 are involved in other cases besides a specific 2018 case, the bail bonds would not be accepted.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners under Section 438 of the CrPC and Section 482 of the BNSS given the nature of the alleged offences.
  • Whether the petitioners' age, gender, and the alleged simple injury justify the grant of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Criminal Procedure
  • Section 438
  • Section 482
  • assault
  • gender considerations
  • age considerations
  • Bihar Narcotic Substances Act

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2964 of 2026
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-221 Year-2025 Thana- BELHAR District- Banka
                 ======================================================
           1.     Bhado Pandit S/o- Late Pritam Pandit Village- Bhagwanpur PO-Sautadih
                  PS- Belhar Dist- Banka
           2.    Bimali Devi @ Bimala Devi W/o- Bhado Pandit Village- Bhagwanpur PO-
                 Sautadih PS- Belhar Dist- Banka
           3.    Suchit Pandit @ Sachit Kumar Pandit S/o- Bhado Pandit Village-
                 Bhagwanpur PO-Sautadih PS- Belhar Dist- Banka
           4.    Saraswati Devi @ Sarswati Kumari W/o- Suchit Pandit @ Sachit Kumar
                 Pandit Village- Bhagwanpur PO-Sautadih PS- Belhar Dist- Banka

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Mukul Jee, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Gauri Shankar Gupta, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   24-02-2026                  Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and

                   learned counsel for the State.

                                2. The petitioners apprehend arrest in connection with

                   Belhar P.S. Case No. 221 of 2025 registered for offences under

                   Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the

                   B.N.S., 2023.

                                3. The petitioners are accused of assaulting the

                   informant and his family members with Khanti, Tengari and

                   Bhujai. The allegation against petitioner no. 3 is of assaulting

                   the son of the informant with iron rod with intent to kill.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2964 of 2026(3) dt.24-02-2026
                                            2/3




                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

          petitioners are quite innocent and have not committed any

          offence. The parties have fought amongst each other and there is

          case and counter case and the injury caused by petitioner no. 3

          is found to be simple in nature caused by hard and blunt

          substance. Petitioners have one criminal antecedent.

                       5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed

          the prayer for bail.

                       6. Considering the age of petitioner no. 1 and

          considering the fact that petitioner nos. 2 and 4 are women, and

          considering the fact that simple injury is caused by petitioner

          no. 3, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners

          are allowed.

                       7. Accordingly, let the petitioners, above- named, in

          the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks from

          today in the Court below, be released on bail on furnishing bail

          bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two

          sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Ld. C.J.M.

          Banka/concerned Court below, in connection with Belhar P.S.

          Case No. 221 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down

          under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/

          Section 482(2) of the BNSS with further condition that:
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2964 of 2026(3) dt.24-02-2026
                                                        3/3




                                   8. At the time of accepting bail bonds on behalf of

                      petitioner nos. 1 and 3, their criminal antecedents shall be

                      verified by the court below. If the petitioner nos. 1 and 3 are

                      accused in more than one case, i.e. apart from Banka Mahila

                      P.S. Case No. 70/2018, then their bail bonds shall not be

                      accepted. If they are found accused in only Banka Mahila P.S.

                      Case No. 70/2018, then their bail bonds shall be accepted.


                                                         (Sandeep Kumar, J)

Ranjeet/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.