Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Komal KumariversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The petition for cancellation of bail is dismissed as it is devoid of merit.

Summary

The petitioner, Komal Kumari, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition seeking cancellation of the bail granted to the second opposite party, Sanjeev Kumar, under Cr. Misc. No. 71415 of 2023 dated 29.02.2024. The respondent counsel submitted that the bail‑granted party has been regularly paying a maintenance amount of Rs.2,000 to the court’s Nazarat, with payments made up to June 2025. It was further clarified that the bail order would remain effective only until the outcome of an ad‑interim maintenance order pending before the Family Court, Katihar. The court examined whether the compliance with maintenance obligations and the pending family court order warranted revocation of bail. Finding that the petition raised no substantive ground to disturb the bail, the court held the petition to be without merit. Consequently, the petition was dismissed and the bail remained in force.

Issues considered

  • Whether the bail granted to the opposite party should be cancelled on account of alleged non‑compliance with maintenance obligations
  • Whether the pending ad‑interim maintenance order affects the validity of the bail

Subjects

  • bail cancellation
  • maintenance order
  • family court
  • criminal miscellaneous petition
  • petition dismissed

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29884 of 2024
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-171 Year-2023 Thana- KORHA District- Katihar
                  ======================================================
                  Komal Kumari W/o Sanjeev Kumar @ Sanjiv Kumar, D/o Kare Lal Poddar
                  R/o Gerabari, P.S.- Korha, Distt.- Katihar.       ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus

            1.    The State of Bihar.
            2.     Sanjeev Kumar @ Sanjiv Kumar S/o Ram Bharoshi Poddar R/o Amarpur,
                   P.S.- Amarpur, Distt.- Banka.
                                                                 ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Advocate
                  For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Ajit Kumar, APP
                  For the O.P. No. 2       :        Mr. Atul Dayal, Advocate
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                        ORAL ORDER

10   10-02-2026                         The      present         petition       preferred           for

                    cancellation of bail as granted to opposite party

                    no. 2 through Cr. Misc. No. 71415 of 2023 dated

                    29.02.2024.

                                 2. It is pointed out by learned counsel

                    appearing for the opposite party no. 2 that in

                    terms of aforesaid order, he is regularly paying the

                    maintenance amount of Rs. 2000/- with Court

                    Nazarat. It is pointed out that up to June 2025, the

                    amount in issue already deposited.

                                 3. It is made clear that the aforesaid order

                    shall remain operational only till outcome of any
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29884 of 2024(10) dt.10-02-2026
                                                          2/2




                        ad-interim maintenance order by learned Family

                        Court, Katihar.

                                     4. In view of aforesaid, the present criminal

                        miscellaneous petition is devoids of any merit,

                        accordingly same stands dismissed.



                                              (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)
veena/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.