Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ajit BindversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The application was disposed of as having become infructuous because the petitioner was arrested during its pendency.

Summary

Petitioner Ajit Bind filed an application before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the application, he was arrested. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the arrest rendered the application infructuous. The court accepted this submission and disposed of the application as infructuous. No further orders were made.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner's arrest during the pendency of the application makes the application infructuous?

Subjects

  • arrest
  • infructuous application
  • criminal procedure
  • petition disposal
  • high court

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29909 of 2026
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-298 Year-2021 Thana- GHOSI District- Jehanabad
                  ======================================================
                  Ajit Bind S/o- Bachan @ Ram Bachan Bind Village- Korma PS- Goshi Dist-
                  Jehanabad
                                                                           ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                 Versus
                  The State of Bihar
                                                                    ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Rajeev Kumar, Adv.
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Amitesh Kumar, APP
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    06-05-2026                  Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP

                    for the State are present.

                                 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                    petitioner has been arrested during the pendency of this

                    application, and therefore, this application has now become

                    infructuous.

                                 3. As per the submission made by learned counsel for

                    the petitioner, this application is disposed of as having become

                    infructuous.


                                               (Alok Kumar Sinha, J)

Prakash Narayan
U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.