Patna High Court
Uday Prakash @ Uday PrasadversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- PRAVEEN KUMAR
Holding
The court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the application and dismissed it as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioner, Uday Prakash, filed an application seeking to raise all points available to him at the appropriate stage of the trial after charges were framed. He later requested permission to withdraw this application. The learned counsel for the petitioner sought the court's leave to withdraw, and the State was represented by an APP. Justice Praveen Kumar allowed the prayer to withdraw, dismissing the application as withdrawn, and expressly noted that no opinion on the merits was expressed. Consequently, the application was closed without any substantive adjudication on the underlying criminal matter.
Issues considered
- Whether the court may permit the petitioner to withdraw his application pending trial
Subjects
- withdrawal of application
- procedural law
- criminal trial
- court discretion
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2991 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-14 Year-2017 Thana- CHANPATIA District- West Champaran
======================================================
Uday Prakash @ Uday Prasad S/O Chandrika Prasad Resident of village -
Ganeshpur, Jhakhra, P.S- Sikta, District- West Champaran
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Brajesh Kumar Singh, Adv
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Lalan Kumar, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 24-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for
the State.
2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks
permission to withdraw this application as during the pendency of this case
charges came to be framed and further prays to raise all the points available
to him and also the grounds pleaded in this application at the appropriate
stage of the trial.
3. Prayer is allowed.
4. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as withdrawn with
the liberty aforesaid.
5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed my opinion
on the merits of this case.
(Praveen Kumar, J)
niku/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.