Patna High Court
Kamlesh Yadav @ Kamlesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
- Bench
- SANDEEP KUMAR
Holding
A successive bail application filed within six months of a prior rejection, absent any material change, must be dismissed.
Summary
The petitioner, Kamlesh Yadav, sought regular bail for charges under Sections 25(1‑B)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. His earlier bail application had been rejected on 24‑12‑2025. He filed a second bail application on 27‑04‑2026, i.e., within six months of the rejection, without any material change in circumstances. The Court observed that filing successive bail applications within six months without substantive change is not permissible. Consequently, the Court dismissed the second bail application.
Issues considered
- Whether a second bail application filed within six months of a prior rejection, without any change in circumstances, can be entertained.
Legislation cited
- Arms Act — s. 25(1‑B)a, 26, 35
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act — s. 30(a)
Subjects
- bail
- criminal procedure
- Arms Act
- successive bail application
- High Court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29931 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-339 Year-2025 Thana- CHHAURADANO District- East
Champaran
======================================================
Kamlesh Yadav @ Kamlesh Kumar S/O Late Chandrika Rai R/O Village-
Kodarkat, P.S- Chhauradano, District.- East Champaran, Motihari.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajesh Kumar
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Braj Kishore Pd.(App)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
3 02-07-2026 Heard the parties.
2. This is the second attempt of the petitioner for grant
of regular bail in connection with Chhauradano P.S. Case No.
339 of 2025 registered for the offence under Sections 25(1-B)a,
26, 35 of the Arms Act and under Section 30(a) of the Bihar
Prohibition and Excise Act.
3. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner was
rejected vide order dated 24.12.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No.
88784 of 2025 and subsequently, this bail application has been
filed on 27.04.2026 which is within six months of earlier
rejection order and this kind of practice of filing the successive
bail application within six months of earlier rejection order
without any substantial change in circumstances, is not
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29931 of 2026(3) dt.02-07-2026
2/2
appreciated by this Court.
4. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Vikas/-
U
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.