Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Naveen Jha @ Naveen Kumar Jha @ Monu @ Monu JhaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

Anticipatory bail was not granted to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Naveen Jha, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with Palasi Police Station Case No. 414 of 2024, which alleged offences under Sections 109, 61(2), 3(5) of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the victim was assaulted during the division of loot and that co‑accused statements implicated the petitioner as a participant. The Station House Officer corroborated the prosecution’s version, stating that the petitioner was involved in the crime. The High Court, after hearing the parties, held that the facts disclosed did not warrant the grant of anticipatory bail. Consequently, the Court dismissed the bail application, vacated the interim protection order dated 11‑05‑2026, and directed the petitioner to surrender within two weeks and seek regular bail, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the underlying criminal case.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner in view of the allegations under the BNS and the Arms Act.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • criminal procedure
  • Arms Act
  • BNS
  • bail application
  • high court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29976 of 2026
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-414 Year-2024 Thana- PALASI District- Araria
                 ======================================================
                 Naveen Jha @ Naveen Kumar Jha @ Monu @ Monu Jha S/o Chandra Shekha
                 Jha R/o Village- Birban, Police Station- Sonamani Godam, District- Araria

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                 The State of Bihar Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Arvind Kumar Mouar.
                                                   Mr.Raj Krishna Jha
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Anand Kishore Choudhary
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   15-06-2026                   Heard the parties.

                                 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection

                   with Palasi P.S. Case No. 414 of 2024 registered for the offence

                   under Sections 109, 61(2), 3(5) of the BNS and under Section

                   27 of the Arms Act.

                                 3. As per the prosecution case, the victim was

                   assaulted by two persons and subsequently, it has come during

                   investigation that for dividing the proceeds of the loot, the

                   injured was assaulted.

                                 4. It has also come in the self-inculpatory statement of

                   the co-accused that the petitioner had participated in the crime

                   along with others.

                                 5. The SHO of Palasi Police Station has appeared in
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29976 of 2026(3) dt.15-06-2026
                                                      2/2




                    this Court and has said that for dividing the proceeds of loot, the

                    alleged occurrence has taken place and the petitioner is also

                    involved in the crime.

                                 6. In view of the aforesaid, this Court does not find

                    this case fit for grant of anticipatory bail.

                                 7. Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

                                 8. The interim protection granted to the petitioner vide

                    order dated 11.05.2026, is hereby vacated.

                                 9. The petitioner is directed to surrender within two

                    weeks from today and pray for regular bail failing which the

                    Superintendent of Police, Araria will take all steps for arrest of

                    the petitioner.

                                 10. It is, however, clarified that the observations made

                    herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail

                    application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at

                    any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not express

                    any opinion on the merits of the case.



                                                            (Sandeep Kumar, J)
Vikas/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.