Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Rakesh SinghversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL REJECTED

Holding

Anticipatory bail was not granted to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Rakesh Singh, sought anticipatory bail after police alleged that he was involved in the sale of illicit liquor, recovering 104.040 litres of foreign liquor from a cowshed near his house. A 16‑year‑old boy apprehended during the raid identified the petitioner as the owner of the premises and his maternal uncle. The petitioner denied any involvement, claiming innocence and noting that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, though he has two prior cases of a similar nature. The State argued that the recovery was from the petitioner’s cowshed and that he is a habitual offender. The Court, considering the recovery from the petitioner’s premises and his antecedents, concluded that the case was not suitable for anticipatory bail and rejected the petition.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act in view of the recovery of illicit liquor from his premises and his prior offences.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • illicit liquor
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • habitual offender
  • bail jurisprudence
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30195 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-14 Year-2026 Thana- EXCISE MAHARAJGANJ District-
                                                         Siwan
                 ======================================================
                 Rakesh Singh, S/o Brijnandan Singh, R/o Village - Ujjay, P.S. - Duraundha,
                 District - Siwan.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :         Ms.Shyamli Kumari, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :         Mr.Braj Kishore Prasad, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   08-05-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. In the present case, the petitioner is apprehending

                   his arrest in connection with Maharajganj P.S. Case No. 14 of

                   2026, registered for the alleged offences under Sections 30(a)

                   and 44 of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

                                3. As         per    prosecution    case,    police      received

                   information about the petitioner selling illicit liquor from a

                   cowshed situated 100 yards from his house. A raid was

                   conducted and a boy aged about 16 years was apprehended and

                   from search of the place, recovery of 104.040 liters of foreign

                   liquor was made. When the raid was being conducted, a person

                   fled away from the spot and the apprehended boy disclosed that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30195 of 2026(2) dt.08-05-2026
                                            2/3




          the said person was this petitioner, who was his maternal uncle

          as well.

                       4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

          the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this

          case. No occurrence as alleged has ever taken place. The

          petitioner has no concern with the seized liquor and no recovery

          has been made from his conscious possession. The petitioner is

          having antecedent of two cases and he is on bail in both the

          cases.

                       5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the

          submission made on behalf of the petitioner. The learned APP

          submits that recovery of illicit liquor was made from the

          cowshed of the petitioner and the petitioner appears to be

          habitual offender as he is having antecedent of two cases of

          similar nature.

                       6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and

          submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the

          fact that recovery of illicit liquor has been shown from the

          cowshed of the petitioner, who is having antecedents of two

          cases of similar nature, I do not find it is a fit case for grant of

          anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

                       7. Accordingly, his prayer for grant of anticipatory
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30195 of 2026(2) dt.08-05-2026
                                                       3/3




                     bail is rejected.



                                               (Arun Kumar Jha, J)
V.K.Pandey/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.