Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Fulmanti Devi @ Bachi Devi @ Sangeeta DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted regular bail to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Fulmanti Devi, mother‑in‑law of the deceased, was charged under Sections 103(1), 238 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for allegedly poisoning the victim over a dowry demand. She had been in custody since 20 January 2025 and her earlier bail application was rejected. The prosecution alleged a dowry‑related murder, while the petitioner claimed innocence and highlighted that the allegations were general and omnibus. The court, noting the length of custody, delay in trial, and the petitioner’s status as a woman, allowed the regular bail application on condition of a bail bond and sureties. The order was limited to the bail matter and did not prejudice the merits of the trial.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail should be granted to the petitioner charged with offences under Sections 103(1), 238 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 considering the nature of the allegations and custodial delay.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • dowry death
  • poisoning
  • criminal procedure
  • gender
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30310 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-12 Year-2025 Thana- SAKURABAD District- Jehanabad
                 ======================================================
                 Fulmanti Devi @ Bachi Devi @ Sangeeta Devi S/O Ramchnadra Sao @ Tota
                 Sao R/V- Gappo Chak, P.S.- Shakarabad, Dist.- Jehanabad

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar Patna

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Eashita Raj
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Narsingh Tanti
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   08-05-2026                  Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

                   learned APP for the State.

                                2. This is the 2nd attempt of the petitioner for regular

                   bail in connection with Shakurabad P.S. Case No. 12 of 2025

                   registered for the offence under Sections 103(1), 238 and 3(5) of

                   the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Earlier the bail application

                   of the petitioner was rejected by this Court on 12.05.2025 in Cr.

                   Misc. No. 20116 of 2025.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner, along

                   with other co-accused persons, allegedly poisoned the deceased

                   due to non-fulfillment of a dowry demand.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence. The

                   petitioner is in custody since 20.01.2025. It is further submitted
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30310 of 2026(2) dt.08-05-2026
                                                        2/2




                      that the allegation against the petitioner is general and omnibus,

                      and the petitioner is the mother-in-law of the deceased. In the

                      trial, out of six witnesses, two witnesses have been examined.

                                   5. Learned A.P.P. has vehemently opposed the prayer

                      for bail.

                                   6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances,

                      the period of custody and the delay in trial as well as the fact

                      that the petitioner is a woman, this application for regular bail is

                      allowed.

                                   7. Accordingly, let the petitioner, above named, be

                      released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten

                      Thousand)with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                      satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is

                      pending/successor Court in connection with Shakurabad P.S.

                      Case No. 12 of 2025.

                                   8. It is made clear that any observation made herein is

                      prima facie in nature and is confined solely to the adjudication

                      of the present bail application. Such observations shall not be

                      construed as an expression on the merits of the case and shall

                      not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any manner.



                                                              (Sandeep Kumar, J)
Shishir/-
U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.